KGC vs. T
KGC (Kinross Gold Corporation) and T (AT&T Inc.) are both stocks. KGC operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while T operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, KGC returned 17.99%/yr vs 2.24%/yr for T. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KGC vs. T - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KGC achieves a -16.65% return, which is significantly lower than T's -5.73% return. Over the past 10 years, KGC has outperformed T with an annualized return of 17.99%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 2.24% annualized return.
KGC
- 1D
- 3.91%
- 1M
- -12.22%
- 6M
- -35.80%
- YTD
- -16.65%
- 1Y
- 47.86%
- 3Y*
- 69.05%
- 5Y*
- 33.20%
- 10Y*
- 17.99%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.04%
T
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 4.07%
- 6M
- -1.30%
- YTD
- -5.73%
- 1Y
- -13.56%
- 3Y*
- 21.50%
- 5Y*
- 7.35%
- 10Y*
- 2.24%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.38%
KGC vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation | -16.65% | 206.11% | 55.63% | 51.83% | -27.59% | -19.00% | 56.04% | 46.30% | -25.00% | 38.91% |
T AT&T Inc. | -5.73% | 13.97% | 44.08% | -2.74% | 5.76% | -8.09% | -21.37% | 45.55% | -22.25% | -4.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between KGC and T is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 1994 | 0.07 |
The correlation between KGC and T shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.16 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
KGC:
$27.97B
T:
$154.67B
KGC:
$2.36
T:
$3.05
KGC:
9.91
T:
7.30
KGC:
0.13
T:
0.30
KGC:
3.57
T:
1.27
KGC:
$7.94B
T:
$125.65B
KGC:
$4.19B
T:
$105.41B
KGC:
$5.02B
T:
$54.70B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KGC vs. T — Risk / Return Rank
KGC
T
KGC vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KGC | T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.92 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.18 | -0.47 | +1.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.83 | -1.04 | +3.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KGC vs. T - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KGC drawdown since its inception was -96.00%, which is greater than T's maximum drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KGC and T.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KGC | T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.00% | -64.15% | -31.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.66% | -28.89% | -11.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.66% | -28.89% | -11.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.22% | -32.01% | -23.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.75% | -42.35% | -25.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.35% | -20.46% | -17.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.53% | -15.74% | -41.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.94% | 13.01% | +3.93% |
Volatility
KGC vs. T - Volatility Comparison
Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) has a higher volatility of 13.32% compared to AT&T Inc. (T) at 9.45%. This indicates that KGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KGC | T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.32% | 9.45% | +3.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.74% | 19.94% | +21.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.43% | 23.72% | +28.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.40% | 24.39% | +20.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.91% | 23.92% | +22.99% |
Dividends
KGC vs. T - Dividend Comparison
KGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than T's 6.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation | 0.62% | 0.44% | 1.29% | 1.98% | 2.93% | 2.69% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
T AT&T Inc. | 6.49% | 4.47% | 4.87% | 6.62% | 6.66% | 8.46% | 7.23% | 5.22% | 7.01% | 5.04% | 4.51% | 5.46% |
Financials
KGC vs. T - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kinross Gold Corporation and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
KGC and T have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KGC has higher volatility (13.32%) compared to T (9.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KGC dropped -96.00% vs T's -64.15%.
KGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KGC and T
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer