PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KGC vs. BBIO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KGC vs. BBIO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) and BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. (BBIO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KGC achieves a -7.93% return, which is significantly higher than BBIO's -11.92% return.


KGC

1D
-1.37%
1M
-17.82%
YTD
-7.93%
6M
-2.01%
1Y
72.32%
3Y*
76.89%
5Y*
29.50%
10Y*
18.75%

BBIO

1D
-0.35%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
-11.92%
6M
-9.25%
1Y
74.44%
3Y*
61.48%
5Y*
1.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KGC vs. BBIO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
KGC
Kinross Gold Corporation
-7.93%206.11%55.63%51.83%-27.59%-19.00%56.04%22.80%
BBIO
BridgeBio Pharma, Inc.
-11.92%178.75%-32.03%429.79%-54.32%-76.54%102.88%27.22%

Correlation

The correlation between KGC and BBIO is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2019

0.14

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KGC:

$31.14B

BBIO:

$13.12B

EPS

KGC:

$2.35

BBIO:

-$3.76

PS Ratio

KGC:

3.96

BBIO:

23.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

KGC:

$7.94B

BBIO:

$566.04M

Gross Profit (TTM)

KGC:

$4.19B

BBIO:

$538.20M

EBITDA (TTM)

KGC:

$5.02B

BBIO:

-$602.24M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KGC vs. BBIO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KGC
KGC Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
KGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
KGC Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
KGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
KGC Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

BBIO
BBIO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
BBIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBIO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
BBIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBIO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KGC vs. BBIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) and BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. (BBIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KGCBBIODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.30

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

3.70

-1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.11

9.25

-3.15

KGC vs. BBIO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KGC Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the BBIO Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KGC and BBIO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KGCBBIODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

1.60

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.02

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.16

-0.09

Drawdowns

KGC vs. BBIO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KGC drawdown since its inception was -96.00%, roughly equal to the maximum BBIO drawdown of -92.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KGC and BBIO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KGCBBIODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.00%

-92.80%

-3.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.89%

-20.25%

-11.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.89%

-49.08%

+17.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.31%

-91.89%

+31.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.89%

-15.69%

-16.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.62%

-45.80%

-11.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.88%

8.07%

+3.81%

Volatility

KGC vs. BBIO - Volatility Comparison

Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) has a higher volatility of 16.41% compared to BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. (BBIO) at 12.10%. This indicates that KGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KGCBBIODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.41%

12.10%

+4.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.75%

34.41%

+5.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.78%

46.75%

+4.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.07%

85.95%

-41.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.95%

83.80%

-36.85%

Dividends

KGC vs. BBIO - Dividend Comparison

KGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, while BBIO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BBIO
BridgeBio Pharma, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KGC
Kinross Gold Corporation
0.56%0.44%1.29%1.98%2.93%2.69%0.82%

Financials

KGC vs. BBIO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kinross Gold Corporation and BridgeBio Pharma, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
2.37B
180.60M
(KGC) Total Revenue
(BBIO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KGC vs. BBIO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kinross Gold Corporation and BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
57.8%
98.8%
Portfolio components
KGC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.37B and revenue of 2.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.8%.

BBIO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. reported a gross profit of 178.39M and revenue of 180.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.8%.

KGC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 1.31B and revenue of 2.37B, resulting in an operating margin of 55.1%.

BBIO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. reported an operating income of -105.96M and revenue of 180.60M, resulting in an operating margin of -58.7%.

KGC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a net income of 831.32M and revenue of 2.37B, resulting in a net margin of 35.0%.

BBIO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. reported a net income of -164.04M and revenue of 180.60M, resulting in a net margin of -90.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KGC and BBIO have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KGC has higher volatility (16.41%) compared to BBIO (12.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KGC dropped -96.00% vs BBIO's -92.80%.

BBIO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KGC and BBIO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer