KEUA vs. KWEB

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

KEUA (KraneShares European Carbon Allowance Strategy ETF) and KWEB (KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KEUA is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P Carbon Credit EUA Index, while KWEB is a China Equities fund tracking the CSI Overseas China Internet Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KEUA charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for KWEB.

Performance

KEUA vs. KWEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares European Carbon Allowance Strategy ETF (KEUA) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

KEUA

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KWEB

• 1D: -2.76%
• 1M: -11.36%
• YTD: -22.53%
• 6M: -25.55%
• 1Y: -18.21%
• 3Y*: 2.02%
• 5Y*: -14.81%
• 10Y*: -0.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KEUA vs. KWEB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
KEUA KraneShares European Carbon Allowance Strategy ETF	-19.02%	32.81%	-14.52%	-3.14%	-2.74%	22.01%
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF	-22.53%	23.55%	12.01%	-9.06%	-17.24%	-14.90%

Correlation

The correlation between KEUA and KWEB is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2021	0.08

Return for Risk

KEUA vs. KWEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KWEB

KWEB Risk / Return Rank: 4
KWEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
KWEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
KWEB Omega Ratio Rank: 4
KWEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
KWEB Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KEUA vs. KWEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares European Carbon Allowance Strategy ETF (KEUA) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KEUA	KWEB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.67	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.31	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.01	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.05	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	KEUA	KWEB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-80.92%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-34.82%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-34.82%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-72.17%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-80.92%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-69.49%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-35.26%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	17.12%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KEUA	KWEB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	10.79%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	20.23%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	27.27%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	47.66%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	39.99%	—

KEUA vs. KWEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

KEUA has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than KWEB's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

KEUA vs. KWEB - Dividend Comparison

KEUA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than KWEB's 7.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KEUA KraneShares European Carbon Allowance Strategy ETF	2.83%	2.29%	7.71%	5.67%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF	7.95%	6.16%	3.51%	1.71%	0.00%	7.07%	0.29%	0.08%	3.40%	0.58%	1.19%	0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KEUA and KWEB in my portfolio?

KEUA and KWEB have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, KEUA or KWEB?

On fees, KWEB is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, KEUA or KWEB?

KWEB is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for KEUA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KEUA or KWEB?

KWEB has the higher dividend yield at 7.95%, compared with 2.83% for KEUA.

What is the main difference between KEUA and KWEB?

KEUA is categorized as Commodities, while KWEB is China Equities. KEUA tracks S&P Carbon Credit EUA Index, while KWEB tracks CSI Overseas China Internet Index. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for KEUA and 0.70% for KWEB.