KEUA vs. ISCMF
KEUA (KraneShares European Carbon Allowance Strategy ETF) and ISCMF (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both Commodities funds - KEUA tracks the S&P Carbon Credit EUA Index while ISCMF tracks the Bloomberg Commodity Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. KEUA charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ISCMF.
Performance
KEUA vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
KEUA
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISCMF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- YTD
- 22.87%
- 6M
- 27.76%
- 1Y
- 37.85%
- 3Y*
- 15.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KEUA vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEUA KraneShares European Carbon Allowance Strategy ETF | -19.02% | 32.81% | -14.52% | -3.14% | 0.10% |
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 22.87% | 19.65% | 3.13% | -9.58% | -5.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between KEUA and ISCMF is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2022 | -0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KEUA vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank
KEUA
ISCMF
KEUA vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares European Carbon Allowance Strategy ETF (KEUA) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KEUA | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.45 | — |
Drawdowns
KEUA vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KEUA | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -25.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -5.26% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -13.44% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.40% | — |
Volatility
KEUA vs. ISCMF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KEUA | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.14% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.90% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 18.53% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 14.38% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 14.38% | — |
KEUA vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
KEUA has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
KEUA vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison
KEUA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, while ISCMF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KEUA KraneShares European Carbon Allowance Strategy ETF | 2.83% | 2.29% | 7.71% | 5.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KEUA and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ISCMF is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ISCMF is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for KEUA.
KEUA has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 0.00% for ISCMF.
KEUA tracks S&P Carbon Credit EUA Index, while ISCMF tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for KEUA and 0.19% for ISCMF.
Find the right allocation for KEUA and ISCMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer