KEQU vs. FWONA
KEQU (Kewaunee Scientific Corporation) and FWONA (Formula One Group) are both stocks. KEQU operates in Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances (Consumer Cyclical), while FWONA operates in Broadcasting (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, KEQU returned 6.49%/yr vs 15.69%/yr for FWONA. Their 0.07 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
KEQU vs. FWONA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KEQU achieves a -4.52% return, which is significantly lower than FWONA's 0.48% return. Over the past 10 years, KEQU has underperformed FWONA with an annualized return of 6.49%, while FWONA has yielded a comparatively higher 15.69% annualized return.
KEQU
- 1D
- -3.04%
- 1M
- -2.62%
- 6M
- -9.66%
- YTD
- -4.52%
- 1Y
- -34.79%
- 3Y*
- 33.39%
- 5Y*
- 21.83%
- 10Y*
- 6.49%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.83%
FWONA
- 1D
- -2.37%
- 1M
- -1.19%
- 6M
- 12.70%
- YTD
- 0.48%
- 1Y
- 1.11%
- 3Y*
- 12.25%
- 5Y*
- 17.74%
- 10Y*
- 15.69%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.86%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
FWONA Formula One Group | $12.62M | $14.95M | $13.90M |
| $244.16K | $193.54K | $169.54K |
KEQU vs. FWONA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEQU Kewaunee Scientific Corporation | -4.52% | -39.53% | 112.83% | 82.26% | 25.59% | 1.57% | -7.04% | -58.34% | 17.53% | 21.56% |
FWONA Formula One Group | 0.48% | 6.35% | 44.95% | 13.34% | -9.96% | 56.20% | -13.23% | 47.31% | -9.17% | 4.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between KEQU and FWONA is 0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2013 | 0.07 |
Fundamentals
KEQU:
$102.46M
FWONA:
$22.51B
KEQU:
$3.22
FWONA:
$4.99
KEQU:
11.09
FWONA:
18.00
KEQU:
0.04
FWONA:
0.52
KEQU:
0.38
FWONA:
3.18
KEQU:
$282.00M
FWONA:
$4.75B
KEQU:
$80.44M
FWONA:
$1.57B
KEQU:
$21.47M
FWONA:
$1.37B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KEQU vs. FWONA — Risk / Return Rank
KEQU
FWONA
KEQU vs. FWONA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (KEQU) and Formula One Group (FWONA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KEQU | FWONA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.02 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | -0.01 | -0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.14 | -0.02 | -1.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KEQU vs. FWONA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KEQU drawdown since its inception was -79.95%, which is greater than FWONA's maximum drawdown of -60.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEQU and FWONA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KEQU | FWONA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.95% | -60.76% | -19.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.11% | -24.99% | -16.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.36% | -25.71% | -29.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.36% | -25.71% | -29.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.95% | -60.76% | -19.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.73% | -9.58% | -39.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.31% | -14.10% | -18.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.00% | 14.21% | +16.79% |
Volatility
KEQU vs. FWONA - Volatility Comparison
Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (KEQU) has a higher volatility of 9.51% compared to Formula One Group (FWONA) at 7.76%. This indicates that KEQU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FWONA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KEQU | FWONA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.51% | 7.76% | +1.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.02% | 19.02% | +8.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.37% | 24.19% | +17.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.33% | 27.09% | +23.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.11% | 32.47% | +14.64% |
Dividends
KEQU vs. FWONA - Dividend Comparison
Neither KEQU nor FWONA has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FWONA Formula One Group | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KEQU Kewaunee Scientific Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.24% | 2.17% | 2.21% | 2.29% | 2.81% |
Financials
KEQU vs. FWONA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kewaunee Scientific Corporation and Formula One Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KEQU vs. FWONA - Profitability Comparison
KEQU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kewaunee Scientific Corporation reported a gross profit of 21.25M and revenue of 71.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.8%.
FWONA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Formula One Group reported a gross profit of 298.00M and revenue of 711.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.9%.
KEQU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kewaunee Scientific Corporation reported an operating income of 5.22M and revenue of 71.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.3%.
FWONA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Formula One Group reported an operating income of 64.00M and revenue of 711.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.0%.
KEQU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kewaunee Scientific Corporation reported a net income of 3.39M and revenue of 71.40M, resulting in a net margin of 4.8%.
FWONA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Formula One Group reported a net income of 57.00M and revenue of 711.00M, resulting in a net margin of 8.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KEQU and FWONA have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KEQU has higher volatility (9.51%) compared to FWONA (7.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KEQU dropped -79.95% vs FWONA's -60.76%.
FWONA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.01 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KEQU and FWONA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer