PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KEQU vs. NNE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KEQU vs. NNE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (KEQU) and NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. (NNE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KEQU achieves a -4.52% return, which is significantly higher than NNE's -33.74% return.


KEQU

1D
-3.04%
1M
-2.62%
6M
-9.66%
YTD
-4.52%
1Y
-34.79%
3Y*
33.39%
5Y*
21.83%
10Y*
6.49%
ALL TIME*
6.83%

NNE

1D
-4.62%
1M
-20.57%
6M
-45.88%
YTD
-33.74%
1Y
-53.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
94.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$244.16K$193.54K$169.54K
$32.41M$37.90M$64.97M

KEQU vs. NNE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
KEQU
Kewaunee Scientific Corporation
-4.52%-39.53%73.38%
NNE
NANO Nuclear Energy Inc.
-33.74%-3.55%591.53%

Correlation

The correlation between KEQU and NNE is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2024

0.04

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KEQU:

$102.46M

NNE:

$854.34M

EPS

KEQU:

$3.22

NNE:

-$192.79

PB Ratio

KEQU:

1.43

NNE:

0.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

KEQU:

$282.00M

NNE:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

KEQU:

$80.44M

NNE:

-$769.48K

EBITDA (TTM)

KEQU:

$21.47M

NNE:

$14.05B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KEQU vs. NNE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KEQU
KEQU Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
KEQU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KEQU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
KEQU Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
KEQU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
KEQU Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

NNE
NNE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
NNE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NNE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
NNE Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
NNE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
NNE Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KEQU vs. NNE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (KEQU) and NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. (NNE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KEQUNNEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

0.95

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.87

-0.75

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.14

-1.17

+0.03

KEQU vs. NNE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KEQU Sharpe Ratio is -0.86, which is lower than the NNE Sharpe Ratio of -0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KEQU and NNE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KEQU vs. NNE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KEQU drawdown since its inception was -79.95%, roughly equal to the maximum NNE drawdown of -77.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEQU and NNE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KEQUNNEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.95%

-77.68%

-2.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.11%

-73.72%

+32.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.73%

-71.91%

+23.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.31%

-37.91%

+5.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.00%

47.01%

-16.01%

Volatility

KEQU vs. NNE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (KEQU) is 9.51%, while NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. (NNE) has a volatility of 23.88%. This indicates that KEQU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NNE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KEQUNNEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.51%

23.88%

-14.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.02%

68.15%

-41.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.37%

98.48%

-57.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.33%

148.58%

-98.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.11%

148.58%

-101.47%

Dividends

KEQU vs. NNE - Dividend Comparison

Neither KEQU nor NNE has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KEQU
Kewaunee Scientific Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.24%2.17%2.21%2.29%2.81%
NNE
NANO Nuclear Energy Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

KEQU vs. NNE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kewaunee Scientific Corporation and NANO Nuclear Energy Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


KEQU and NNE have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NNE has higher volatility (23.88%) compared to KEQU (9.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KEQU dropped -79.95% vs NNE's -77.68%.

NNE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.56 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KEQU and NNE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer