KEQU vs. GDDY
KEQU (Kewaunee Scientific Corporation) and GDDY (GoDaddy Inc.) are both stocks. KEQU operates in Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances (Consumer Cyclical), while GDDY operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 10 years, KEQU returned 6.49%/yr vs 10.92%/yr for GDDY. Their 0.07 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
KEQU vs. GDDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KEQU achieves a -4.52% return, which is significantly higher than GDDY's -33.32% return. Over the past 10 years, KEQU has underperformed GDDY with an annualized return of 6.49%, while GDDY has yielded a comparatively higher 10.92% annualized return.
KEQU
- 1D
- -3.04%
- 1M
- -2.62%
- 6M
- -9.66%
- YTD
- -4.52%
- 1Y
- -34.79%
- 3Y*
- 33.39%
- 5Y*
- 21.83%
- 10Y*
- 6.49%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.83%
GDDY
- 1D
- -16.70%
- 1M
- -6.52%
- 6M
- -17.69%
- YTD
- -33.32%
- 1Y
- -47.12%
- 3Y*
- 2.29%
- 5Y*
- -0.27%
- 10Y*
- 10.92%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.70%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
GDDY GoDaddy Inc. | $190.87M | $170.70M | $214.02M |
| $244.16K | $193.54K | $169.54K |
KEQU vs. GDDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEQU Kewaunee Scientific Corporation | -4.52% | -39.53% | 112.83% | 82.26% | 25.59% | 1.57% | -7.04% | -58.34% | 17.53% | 21.56% |
GDDY GoDaddy Inc. | -33.32% | -37.13% | 85.92% | 41.89% | -11.83% | 2.30% | 22.13% | 3.51% | 30.51% | 43.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between KEQU and GDDY is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2015 | 0.07 |
Fundamentals
KEQU:
$102.46M
GDDY:
$10.96B
KEQU:
$3.22
GDDY:
$8.84
KEQU:
11.09
GDDY:
9.36
KEQU:
0.04
GDDY:
0.11
KEQU:
0.38
GDDY:
2.20
KEQU:
1.43
GDDY:
1.64K
KEQU:
$282.00M
GDDY:
$5.10B
KEQU:
$80.44M
GDDY:
$3.16B
KEQU:
$21.47M
GDDY:
$1.26B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KEQU vs. GDDY — Risk / Return Rank
KEQU
GDDY
KEQU vs. GDDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (KEQU) and GoDaddy Inc. (GDDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KEQU | GDDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 0.79 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | -0.93 | +0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.14 | -1.42 | +0.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KEQU vs. GDDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KEQU drawdown since its inception was -79.95%, which is greater than GDDY's maximum drawdown of -65.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEQU and GDDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KEQU | GDDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.95% | -65.02% | -14.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.11% | -52.58% | +11.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.36% | -65.02% | +9.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.36% | -65.02% | +9.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.95% | -65.02% | -14.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.73% | -61.40% | +12.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.31% | -14.39% | -17.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.00% | 35.65% | -4.65% |
Volatility
KEQU vs. GDDY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (KEQU) is 9.51%, while GoDaddy Inc. (GDDY) has a volatility of 24.29%. This indicates that KEQU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KEQU | GDDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.51% | 24.29% | -14.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.02% | 41.19% | -14.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.37% | 45.44% | -4.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.33% | 34.69% | +15.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.11% | 35.17% | +11.94% |
Dividends
KEQU vs. GDDY - Dividend Comparison
Neither KEQU nor GDDY has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDDY GoDaddy Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KEQU Kewaunee Scientific Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.24% | 2.17% | 2.21% | 2.29% | 2.81% |
Financials
KEQU vs. GDDY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kewaunee Scientific Corporation and GoDaddy Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KEQU vs. GDDY - Profitability Comparison
KEQU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kewaunee Scientific Corporation reported a gross profit of 21.25M and revenue of 71.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.8%.
GDDY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, GoDaddy Inc. reported a gross profit of 926.80M and revenue of 1.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.4%.
KEQU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kewaunee Scientific Corporation reported an operating income of 5.22M and revenue of 71.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.3%.
GDDY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, GoDaddy Inc. reported an operating income of 340.30M and revenue of 1.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.2%.
KEQU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kewaunee Scientific Corporation reported a net income of 3.39M and revenue of 71.40M, resulting in a net margin of 4.8%.
GDDY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, GoDaddy Inc. reported a net income of 528.50M and revenue of 1.30B, resulting in a net margin of 40.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KEQU and GDDY have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDDY has higher volatility (24.29%) compared to KEQU (9.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KEQU dropped -79.95% vs GDDY's -65.02%.
KEQU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.86 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KEQU and GDDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer