PortfoliosLab logo
FWONA vs. FWONK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between FWONA and FWONK is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

FWONA vs. FWONK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Formula One Group (FWONA) and Formula One Group (FWONK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

FWONA:

27.76%

FWONK:

20.62%

Max Drawdown

FWONA:

-1.54%

FWONK:

-0.60%

Current Drawdown

FWONA:

0.00%

FWONK:

0.00%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FWONA:

$23.76B

FWONK:

$23.52B

EPS

FWONA:

-$0.13

FWONK:

-$0.12

PEG Ratio

FWONA:

4.19

FWONK:

4.50

PS Ratio

FWONA:

6.45

FWONK:

6.45

PB Ratio

FWONA:

2.86

FWONK:

3.38

Total Revenue (TTM)

FWONA:

$3.51B

FWONK:

$3.51B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FWONA:

$916.00M

FWONK:

$916.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

FWONA:

-$2.27B

FWONK:

-$2.27B

Returns By Period


FWONA

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FWONK

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FWONA vs. FWONK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWONA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FWONA is 8585
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FWONA is 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FWONA is 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FWONA is 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FWONA is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FWONA is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

FWONK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FWONK is 8484
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FWONK is 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FWONK is 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FWONK is 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FWONK is 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FWONK is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FWONA vs. FWONK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Formula One Group (FWONA) and Formula One Group (FWONK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

FWONA vs. FWONK - Dividend Comparison

Neither FWONA nor FWONK has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FWONA vs. FWONK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FWONA drawdown since its inception was -1.54%, which is greater than FWONK's maximum drawdown of -0.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWONA and FWONK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FWONA vs. FWONK - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...

Financials

FWONA vs. FWONK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Formula One Group and Formula One Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20212022202320242025
447.00M
447.00M
(FWONA) Total Revenue
(FWONK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FWONA vs. FWONK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Formula One Group and Formula One Group over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20212022202320242025
27.3%
27.3%
(FWONA) Gross Margin
(FWONK) Gross Margin
FWONA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Formula One Group reported a gross profit of 122.00M and revenue of 447.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.3%.

FWONK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Formula One Group reported a gross profit of 122.00M and revenue of 447.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.3%.

FWONA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Formula One Group reported an operating income of -60.00M and revenue of 447.00M, resulting in an operating margin of -13.4%.

FWONK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Formula One Group reported an operating income of -60.00M and revenue of 447.00M, resulting in an operating margin of -13.4%.

FWONA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Formula One Group reported a net income of 5.00M and revenue of 447.00M, resulting in a net margin of 1.1%.

FWONK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Formula One Group reported a net income of 5.00M and revenue of 447.00M, resulting in a net margin of 1.1%.