PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KEMX vs. VEU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KEMX vs. VEU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) and Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KEMX achieves a 44.15% return, which is significantly higher than VEU's 15.73% return.


KEMX

1D
0.91%
1M
14.75%
YTD
44.15%
6M
50.30%
1Y
82.49%
3Y*
30.23%
5Y*
14.09%
10Y*

VEU

1D
0.73%
1M
5.19%
YTD
15.73%
6M
18.94%
1Y
33.06%
3Y*
20.01%
5Y*
9.10%
10Y*
10.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KEMX vs. VEU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
KEMX
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
44.15%38.28%0.36%20.57%-19.35%10.55%12.84%7.93%
VEU
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF
15.73%32.35%5.56%15.84%-15.58%8.27%11.10%7.42%

Correlation

The correlation between KEMX and VEU is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2019

0.86

The correlation between KEMX and VEU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

KEMX vs. VEU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KEMX
VEU

Technology

41.2%
18.5%

Financial Services

20.7%
23.3%

Industrials

8.6%
15.7%

Basic Materials

8.2%
7.1%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
8.2%

Energy

4.8%
5.2%

Communication Services

3.2%
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
5.1%

Utilities

2.0%
3.2%

Healthcare

1.7%
7.1%

Real Estate

1.2%
2.0%

Technology

KEMX
41.2%
VEU
18.5%

Financial Services

KEMX
20.7%
VEU
23.3%

Industrials

KEMX
8.6%
VEU
15.7%

Basic Materials

KEMX
8.2%
VEU
7.1%

Consumer Cyclical

KEMX
5.4%
VEU
8.2%

Energy

KEMX
4.8%
VEU
5.2%

Communication Services

KEMX
3.2%
VEU
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

KEMX
3.0%
VEU
5.1%

Utilities

KEMX
2.0%
VEU
3.2%

Healthcare

KEMX
1.7%
VEU
7.1%

Real Estate

KEMX
1.2%
VEU
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KEMX vs. VEU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KEMX
KEMX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
KEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
KEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
KEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
KEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

VEU
VEU Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
VEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEU Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
VEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEU Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KEMX vs. VEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) and Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KEMXVEUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.71

2.18

+1.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.43

3.00

+1.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.40

+0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.44

3.01

+2.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

21.72

11.72

+10.00

KEMX vs. VEU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KEMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.71, which is higher than the VEU Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KEMX and VEU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KEMXVEUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.71

2.18

+1.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.57

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.26

+0.44

Drawdowns

KEMX vs. VEU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KEMX drawdown since its inception was -38.80%, smaller than the maximum VEU drawdown of -61.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEMX and VEU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KEMXVEUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.80%

-61.52%

+22.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.36%

-11.43%

-3.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.62%

-13.69%

-5.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.85%

-29.31%

-1.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.86%

-13.14%

+4.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.85%

2.93%

+0.92%

Volatility

KEMX vs. VEU - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) has a higher volatility of 9.67% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU) at 5.57%. This indicates that KEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KEMXVEUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.67%

5.57%

+4.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.84%

13.01%

+6.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.34%

15.28%

+7.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.20%

16.07%

+2.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.94%

17.21%

+3.73%

KEMX vs. VEU - Expense Ratio Comparison

KEMX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VEU's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

KEMX vs. VEU - Dividend Comparison

KEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than VEU's 2.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KEMX
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
2.28%3.28%3.39%2.00%4.10%4.79%1.69%2.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEU
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF
2.58%3.09%3.24%3.32%3.12%3.08%2.00%3.10%3.27%2.66%2.96%2.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


KEMX and VEU have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KEMX has higher volatility (9.67%) compared to VEU (5.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KEMX dropped -38.80% vs VEU's -61.52%.

On 5-year performance, KEMX leads with 14.09% vs 9.10% for VEU. On fees, VEU is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VEU has been the lower-risk option at 5.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, KEMX has performed better with a 14.09% return vs 9.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEU is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for KEMX.

VEU has the higher dividend yield at 2.58%, compared with 2.28% for KEMX.

KEMX tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while VEU tracks FTSE All-World ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: CICC and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for KEMX and 0.04% for VEU.

KEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.71 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KEMX and VEU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer