PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KEMX vs. KVLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KEMX vs. KVLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) and KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF (KVLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KEMX achieves a 42.26% return, which is significantly higher than KVLE's 10.22% return.


KEMX

1D
-1.31%
1M
13.02%
YTD
42.26%
6M
47.92%
1Y
79.97%
3Y*
29.66%
5Y*
13.52%
10Y*

KVLE

1D
-0.91%
1M
4.69%
YTD
10.22%
6M
9.55%
1Y
18.85%
3Y*
14.93%
5Y*
9.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KEMX vs. KVLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
KEMX
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
42.26%38.28%0.36%20.57%-19.35%10.55%8.76%
KVLE
KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF
10.22%9.34%18.25%10.49%-5.96%28.01%1.36%

Correlation

The correlation between KEMX and KVLE is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2020

0.60

The correlation between KEMX and KVLE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

KEMX vs. KVLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KEMX
KVLE

Technology

41.2%
27.0%

Financial Services

20.7%
12.2%

Industrials

8.6%
12.6%

Basic Materials

8.2%
1.3%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
9.2%

Energy

4.8%
4.6%

Communication Services

3.2%
3.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
6.8%

Utilities

2.0%
0.7%

Healthcare

1.7%
9.3%

Real Estate

1.2%
12.0%

Technology

KEMX
41.2%
KVLE
27.0%

Financial Services

KEMX
20.7%
KVLE
12.2%

Industrials

KEMX
8.6%
KVLE
12.6%

Basic Materials

KEMX
8.2%
KVLE
1.3%

Consumer Cyclical

KEMX
5.4%
KVLE
9.2%

Energy

KEMX
4.8%
KVLE
4.6%

Communication Services

KEMX
3.2%
KVLE
3.9%

Consumer Defensive

KEMX
3.0%
KVLE
6.8%

Utilities

KEMX
2.0%
KVLE
0.7%

Healthcare

KEMX
1.7%
KVLE
9.3%

Real Estate

KEMX
1.2%
KVLE
12.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KEMX vs. KVLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KEMX
KEMX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
KEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
KEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
KEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
KEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

KVLE
KVLE Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
KVLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KVLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
KVLE Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
KVLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
KVLE Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KEMX vs. KVLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) and KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF (KVLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KEMXKVLEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.59

1.72

+1.87

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.31

2.45

+1.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.31

+0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.24

1.97

+3.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.86

7.57

+13.29

KEMX vs. KVLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KEMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.59, which is higher than the KVLE Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KEMX and KVLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KEMXKVLEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.59

1.72

+1.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.67

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.88

-0.20

Drawdowns

KEMX vs. KVLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KEMX drawdown since its inception was -38.80%, which is greater than KVLE's maximum drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEMX and KVLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KEMXKVLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.80%

-18.38%

-20.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.36%

-9.59%

-5.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.62%

-16.39%

-3.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.85%

-18.38%

-12.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.31%

-0.91%

-0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.86%

-3.21%

-5.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.85%

2.50%

+1.35%

Volatility

KEMX vs. KVLE - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) has a higher volatility of 9.86% compared to KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF (KVLE) at 2.64%. This indicates that KEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KVLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KEMXKVLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.86%

2.64%

+7.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.90%

8.35%

+11.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.40%

11.04%

+11.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.21%

14.51%

+3.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.94%

14.33%

+6.61%

KEMX vs. KVLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

KEMX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than KVLE's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

KEMX vs. KVLE - Dividend Comparison

KEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than KVLE's 7.30% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
KEMX
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
2.31%3.28%3.39%2.00%4.10%4.79%1.69%2.77%
KVLE
KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF
7.30%7.90%7.99%2.53%5.78%9.51%0.35%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KEMX and KVLE have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KEMX has higher volatility (9.86%) compared to KVLE (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KEMX dropped -38.80% vs KVLE's -18.38%.

On 5-year performance, KEMX leads with 13.52% vs 9.67% for KVLE. On fees, KEMX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, KVLE has been the lower-risk option at 2.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, KEMX has performed better with a 13.52% return vs 9.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KEMX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for KVLE.

KVLE has the higher dividend yield at 7.30%, compared with 2.31% for KEMX.

KEMX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while KVLE is Large Cap Value Equities. KEMX tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while KVLE tracks 3D/L Value Line Dynamic Core Equity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for KEMX and 0.56% for KVLE.

KEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.59 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KEMX and KVLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer