KEMX vs. KVLE
KEMX (KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF) and KVLE (KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KEMX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while KVLE is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the 3D/L Value Line Dynamic Core Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KEMX returned 13.52%/yr vs 9.67%/yr for KVLE. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KEMX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for KVLE.
Performance
KEMX vs. KVLE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KEMX achieves a 42.26% return, which is significantly higher than KVLE's 10.22% return.
KEMX
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- 13.02%
- YTD
- 42.26%
- 6M
- 47.92%
- 1Y
- 79.97%
- 3Y*
- 29.66%
- 5Y*
- 13.52%
- 10Y*
- —
KVLE
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- 4.69%
- YTD
- 10.22%
- 6M
- 9.55%
- 1Y
- 18.85%
- 3Y*
- 14.93%
- 5Y*
- 9.67%
- 10Y*
- —
KEMX vs. KVLE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF | 42.26% | 38.28% | 0.36% | 20.57% | -19.35% | 10.55% | 8.76% |
KVLE KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF | 10.22% | 9.34% | 18.25% | 10.49% | -5.96% | 28.01% | 1.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between KEMX and KVLE is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2020 | 0.60 |
The correlation between KEMX and KVLE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
KEMX vs. KVLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KEMX
KVLE
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Healthcare
Real Estate
Technology
KEMX
KVLE
Financial Services
KEMX
KVLE
Industrials
KEMX
KVLE
Basic Materials
KEMX
KVLE
Consumer Cyclical
KEMX
KVLE
Energy
KEMX
KVLE
Communication Services
KEMX
KVLE
Consumer Defensive
KEMX
KVLE
Utilities
KEMX
KVLE
Healthcare
KEMX
KVLE
Real Estate
KEMX
KVLE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KEMX vs. KVLE — Risk / Return Rank
KEMX
KVLE
KEMX vs. KVLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) and KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF (KVLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KEMX | KVLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.59 | 1.72 | +1.87 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.31 | 2.45 | +1.86 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.31 | +0.31 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.24 | 1.97 | +3.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.86 | 7.57 | +13.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KEMX | KVLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.59 | 1.72 | +1.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.67 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.88 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
KEMX vs. KVLE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KEMX drawdown since its inception was -38.80%, which is greater than KVLE's maximum drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEMX and KVLE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KEMX | KVLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.80% | -18.38% | -20.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.36% | -9.59% | -5.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.62% | -16.39% | -3.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.85% | -18.38% | -12.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.31% | -0.91% | -0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.86% | -3.21% | -5.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.85% | 2.50% | +1.35% |
Volatility
KEMX vs. KVLE - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) has a higher volatility of 9.86% compared to KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF (KVLE) at 2.64%. This indicates that KEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KVLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KEMX | KVLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.86% | 2.64% | +7.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.90% | 8.35% | +11.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.40% | 11.04% | +11.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.21% | 14.51% | +3.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.94% | 14.33% | +6.61% |
KEMX vs. KVLE - Expense Ratio Comparison
KEMX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than KVLE's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
KEMX vs. KVLE - Dividend Comparison
KEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than KVLE's 7.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF | 2.31% | 3.28% | 3.39% | 2.00% | 4.10% | 4.79% | 1.69% | 2.77% |
KVLE KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF | 7.30% | 7.90% | 7.99% | 2.53% | 5.78% | 9.51% | 0.35% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KEMX and KVLE have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KEMX has higher volatility (9.86%) compared to KVLE (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KEMX dropped -38.80% vs KVLE's -18.38%.
On 5-year performance, KEMX leads with 13.52% vs 9.67% for KVLE. On fees, KEMX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, KVLE has been the lower-risk option at 2.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, KEMX has performed better with a 13.52% return vs 9.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KEMX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for KVLE.
KVLE has the higher dividend yield at 7.30%, compared with 2.31% for KEMX.
KEMX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while KVLE is Large Cap Value Equities. KEMX tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while KVLE tracks 3D/L Value Line Dynamic Core Equity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for KEMX and 0.56% for KVLE.
KEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.59 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KEMX and KVLE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer