KEMX vs. IDEQ

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) and Lazard International Dynamic Equity ETF (IDEQ).

KEMX and IDEQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KEMX is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. It was launched on Apr 12, 2019. IDEQ is an actively managed fund by Lazard. It was launched on May 12, 2025.

Performance

KEMX vs. IDEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) and Lazard International Dynamic Equity ETF (IDEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

KEMX vs. IDEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF	9.35%	17.73%
IDEQ Lazard International Dynamic Equity ETF	4.61%	11.77%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KEMX achieves a 9.35% return, which is significantly higher than IDEQ's 4.61% return.

KEMX

• 1D: 4.34%
• 1M: -11.07%
• YTD: 9.35%
• 6M: 21.09%
• 1Y: 50.32%
• 3Y*: 20.32%
• 5Y*: 9.05%
• 10Y*: —

IDEQ

• 1D: 3.62%
• 1M: -9.10%
• YTD: 4.61%
• 6M: 12.68%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KEMX vs. IDEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

KEMX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IDEQ's 0.40% expense ratio.

IDEQ

Lazard International Dynamic Equity ETF

KEMX

KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF

Return for Risk

KEMX vs. IDEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KEMX

KEMX Risk / Return Rank: 94
KEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
KEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
KEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
KEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
KEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KEMX vs. IDEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) and Lazard International Dynamic Equity ETF (IDEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KEMX	IDEQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.36	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.00	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.25	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.60	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KEMX	IDEQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.36	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	1.80	-1.30

Correlation

The correlation between KEMX and IDEQ is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

KEMX vs. IDEQ - Dividend Comparison

KEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, more than IDEQ's 0.58% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF	3.00%	3.28%	3.39%	2.00%	4.10%	4.79%	1.69%	2.77%
IDEQ Lazard International Dynamic Equity ETF	0.58%	0.60%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

KEMX vs. IDEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KEMX drawdown since its inception was -38.80%, which is greater than IDEQ's maximum drawdown of -12.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEMX and IDEQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	KEMX	IDEQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.80%	-12.95%	-25.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.36%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.85%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.68%	-9.80%	-1.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.02%	-1.84%	-7.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.67%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KEMX	IDEQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.58%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.96%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.39%	17.24%	+4.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.55%	17.24%	+0.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.61%	17.24%	+3.37%