PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KEMX vs. CIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KEMX vs. CIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KEMX achieves a 44.15% return, which is significantly higher than CIL's 5.44% return.


KEMX

1D
0.91%
1M
14.75%
YTD
44.15%
6M
50.30%
1Y
82.49%
3Y*
30.23%
5Y*
14.09%
10Y*

CIL

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
5.44%
6M
8.27%
1Y
16.20%
3Y*
15.59%
5Y*
7.45%
10Y*
8.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KEMX vs. CIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
KEMX
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
44.15%38.28%0.36%20.57%-19.35%10.55%12.84%7.93%
CIL
VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF
5.44%32.99%3.76%16.29%-16.00%11.07%7.21%5.75%

Correlation

The correlation between KEMX and CIL is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2019

0.61

The correlation between KEMX and CIL shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.64 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

KEMX vs. CIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KEMX
CIL

Technology

41.2%
6.4%

Financial Services

20.7%
24.8%

Industrials

8.6%
18.4%

Basic Materials

8.2%
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
8.2%

Energy

4.8%
4.6%

Communication Services

3.2%
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
8.8%

Utilities

2.0%
6.6%

Healthcare

1.7%
7.7%

Real Estate

1.2%
2.2%

Technology

KEMX
41.2%
CIL
6.4%

Financial Services

KEMX
20.7%
CIL
24.8%

Industrials

KEMX
8.6%
CIL
18.4%

Basic Materials

KEMX
8.2%
CIL
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

KEMX
5.4%
CIL
8.2%

Energy

KEMX
4.8%
CIL
4.6%

Communication Services

KEMX
3.2%
CIL
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

KEMX
3.0%
CIL
8.8%

Utilities

KEMX
2.0%
CIL
6.6%

Healthcare

KEMX
1.7%
CIL
7.7%

Real Estate

KEMX
1.2%
CIL
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KEMX vs. CIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KEMX
KEMX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
KEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
KEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
KEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
KEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

CIL
CIL Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
CIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIL Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
CIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIL Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KEMX vs. CIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KEMXCILDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.71

2.07

+1.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.43

2.96

+1.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.45

+0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.44

4.32

+1.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

21.72

18.62

+3.10

KEMX vs. CIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KEMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.71, which is higher than the CIL Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KEMX and CIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KEMXCILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.71

2.07

+1.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.46

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.43

+0.26

Drawdowns

KEMX vs. CIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KEMX drawdown since its inception was -38.80%, which is greater than CIL's maximum drawdown of -36.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEMX and CIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KEMXCILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.80%

-36.27%

-2.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.36%

-4.60%

-10.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.62%

-11.96%

-7.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.85%

-29.89%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.58%

+0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.86%

-6.56%

-2.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.85%

1.07%

+2.78%

Volatility

KEMX vs. CIL - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) has a higher volatility of 9.67% compared to VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) at 0.00%. This indicates that KEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KEMXCILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.67%

0.00%

+9.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.84%

4.42%

+15.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.34%

8.26%

+14.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.20%

16.49%

+1.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.94%

17.18%

+3.76%

KEMX vs. CIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

KEMX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CIL's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

KEMX vs. CIL - Dividend Comparison

KEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, more than CIL's 1.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIL
VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF
1.67%2.70%3.46%2.91%2.41%3.04%1.73%2.69%2.85%2.17%2.34%0.43%
KEMX
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
2.28%3.28%3.39%2.00%4.10%4.79%1.69%2.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KEMX and CIL have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KEMX has higher volatility (9.67%) compared to CIL (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KEMX dropped -38.80% vs CIL's -36.27%.

On 5-year performance, KEMX leads with 14.09% vs 7.45% for CIL. On fees, KEMX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, CIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, KEMX has performed better with a 14.09% return vs 7.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KEMX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CIL.

KEMX has the higher dividend yield at 2.28%, compared with 1.67% for CIL.

KEMX tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while CIL tracks Nasdaq Victory International 500 Volatility Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: CICC and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for KEMX and 0.45% for CIL.

KEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.71 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KEMX and CIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer