KE vs. FLUX
KE (Kimball Electronics, Inc.) and FLUX (Flux Power Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, KE returned 7.72%/yr vs 5.66%/yr for FLUX. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KE vs. FLUX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KE achieves a -6.65% return, which is significantly higher than FLUX's -36.61% return. Over the past 10 years, KE has outperformed FLUX with an annualized return of 7.72%, while FLUX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.66% annualized return.
KE
- 1D
- 2.65%
- 1M
- 5.57%
- YTD
- -6.65%
- 6M
- -9.07%
- 1Y
- 37.77%
- 3Y*
- -0.37%
- 5Y*
- 3.60%
- 10Y*
- 7.72%
FLUX
- 1D
- -6.40%
- 1M
- -21.08%
- YTD
- -36.61%
- 6M
- -41.67%
- 1Y
- -44.48%
- 3Y*
- -40.95%
- 5Y*
- -40.42%
- 10Y*
- 5.66%
KE vs. FLUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KE Kimball Electronics, Inc. | -6.65% | 48.53% | -30.50% | 19.30% | 3.81% | 36.09% | -8.89% | 13.30% | -15.12% | 0.27% |
FLUX Flux Power Holdings, Inc. | -36.61% | -19.62% | -61.56% | 3.53% | -7.46% | -75.12% | 87.60% | -47.49% | 337.50% | 875.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between KE and FLUX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2014 | 0.14 |
The correlation between KE and FLUX shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (all time) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
KE:
$640.11M
FLUX:
$17.18M
KE:
$1.05
FLUX:
-$0.35
KE:
0.45
FLUX:
0.29
KE:
$1.44B
FLUX:
$50.62M
KE:
$115.15M
FLUX:
$16.23M
KE:
$77.66M
FLUX:
-$212.00K
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KE vs. FLUX — Risk / Return Rank
KE
FLUX
KE vs. FLUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimball Electronics, Inc. (KE) and Flux Power Holdings, Inc. (FLUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KE | FLUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.04 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.20 | -0.51 | +1.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.26 | -0.69 | +2.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KE vs. FLUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KE drawdown since its inception was -58.50%, smaller than the maximum FLUX drawdown of -99.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KE and FLUX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KE | FLUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.50% | -99.95% | +41.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.69% | -87.91% | +56.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.50% | -87.91% | +29.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.50% | -93.38% | +34.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.50% | -97.37% | +38.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.61% | -99.19% | +77.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.81% | -92.10% | +68.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.73% | 64.66% | -47.93% |
Volatility
KE vs. FLUX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kimball Electronics, Inc. (KE) is 12.75%, while Flux Power Holdings, Inc. (FLUX) has a volatility of 18.28%. This indicates that KE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KE | FLUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.75% | 18.28% | -5.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.43% | 66.02% | -25.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.13% | 130.40% | -81.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.88% | 93.10% | -52.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.79% | 313.27% | -273.48% |
Dividends
KE vs. FLUX - Dividend Comparison
Neither KE nor FLUX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
KE vs. FLUX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kimball Electronics, Inc. and Flux Power Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KE vs. FLUX - Profitability Comparison
KE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimball Electronics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 27.82M and revenue of 352.92M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.9%.
FLUX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flux Power Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.80M and revenue of 6.59M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.3%.
KE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimball Electronics, Inc. reported an operating income of 11.76M and revenue of 352.92M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.3%.
FLUX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flux Power Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.18M and revenue of 6.59M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.9%.
KE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimball Electronics, Inc. reported a net income of 5.72M and revenue of 352.92M, resulting in a net margin of 1.6%.
FLUX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flux Power Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of -3.18M and revenue of 6.59M, resulting in a net margin of -48.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KE and FLUX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLUX has higher volatility (18.28%) compared to KE (12.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KE dropped -58.50% vs FLUX's -99.95%.
KE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KE and FLUX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer