FLUX vs. DAKT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Flux Power Holdings, Inc. (FLUX) and Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT).

Performance

FLUX vs. DAKT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Flux Power Holdings, Inc. (FLUX) and Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FLUX vs. DAKT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLUX Flux Power Holdings, Inc.	-15.75%	-19.62%	-61.56%	3.53%	-7.46%	-75.12%	87.60%	-47.49%	337.50%	875.61%
DAKT Daktronics, Inc.	-1.11%	17.26%	98.82%	200.71%	-44.16%	7.91%	-22.41%	-15.05%	-16.17%	-12.12%

Fundamentals

Market Cap FLUX : $24.46M DAKT : $968.27M
EPS FLUX : -$0.27 DAKT : $0.56
PS Ratio FLUX : 0.33 DAKT : 1.20
PB Ratio FLUX : 3.25 DAKT : 3.30
Total Revenue (TTM) FLUX : $60.78M DAKT : $802.65M
Gross Profit (TTM) FLUX : $19.72M DAKT : $213.67M
EBITDA (TTM) FLUX : -$2.97M DAKT : $41.38M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLUX achieves a -15.75% return, which is significantly lower than DAKT's -1.11% return. Over the past 10 years, FLUX has underperformed DAKT with an annualized return of 9.05%, while DAKT has yielded a comparatively higher 10.78% annualized return.

FLUX

• 1D: 3.88%
• 1M: -27.70%
• YTD: -15.75%
• 6M: -71.39%
• 1Y: -37.79%
• 3Y*: -39.62%
• 5Y*: -39.60%
• 10Y*: 9.05%

DAKT

• 1D: 2.30%
• 1M: -24.17%
• YTD: -1.11%
• 6M: -6.55%
• 1Y: 60.51%
• 3Y*: 51.07%
• 5Y*: 24.91%
• 10Y*: 10.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

FLUX vs. DAKT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLUX

FLUX Risk / Return Rank: 32
FLUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
FLUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
FLUX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
FLUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
FLUX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

DAKT

DAKT Risk / Return Rank: 77
DAKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
DAKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
DAKT Omega Ratio Rank: 76
DAKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
DAKT Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLUX vs. DAKT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flux Power Holdings, Inc. (FLUX) and Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLUX	DAKT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.29	1.20	-1.50
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.41	1.93	-1.53
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.25	-0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.51	2.01	-2.51
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.83	4.48	-5.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLUX vs. DAKT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLUX Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the DAKT Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLUX and DAKT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLUX	DAKT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.29	1.20	-1.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.43	0.48	-0.91
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.03	0.23	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.01	0.19	-0.20

Correlation

The correlation between FLUX and DAKT is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FLUX vs. DAKT - Dividend Comparison

Neither FLUX nor DAKT has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLUX Flux Power Holdings, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DAKT Daktronics, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.07%	3.61%	3.78%	3.07%	3.18%	4.59%

Drawdowns

FLUX vs. DAKT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLUX drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than DAKT's maximum drawdown of -92.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLUX and DAKT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLUX	DAKT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-100.00%	-92.96%	-7.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-84.83%	-31.09%	-53.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-92.55%	-75.69%	-16.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-96.70%	-82.34%	-14.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.99%	-29.50%	-70.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-95.50%	-50.26%	-45.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	51.98%	13.94%	+38.04%

Volatility

FLUX vs. DAKT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Flux Power Holdings, Inc. (FLUX) is 16.19%, while Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT) has a volatility of 18.64%. This indicates that FLUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DAKT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLUX	DAKT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.19%	18.64%	-2.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	98.66%	33.38%	+65.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	128.98%	50.64%	+78.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	93.37%	52.11%	+41.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	313.52%	46.37%	+267.15%

Financials

FLUX vs. DAKT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Flux Power Holdings, Inc. and Daktronics, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

FLUX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Flux Power Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.90M and revenue of 14.12M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.7%.

DAKT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Daktronics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 43.63M and revenue of 181.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.0%.

FLUX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Flux Power Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 795.00K and revenue of 14.12M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.6%.

DAKT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Daktronics, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.92M and revenue of 181.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.1%.

FLUX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Flux Power Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 601.00K and revenue of 14.12M, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.

DAKT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Daktronics, Inc. reported a net income of 3.01M and revenue of 181.87M, resulting in a net margin of 1.7%.