FLUX vs. DAKT
FLUX (Flux Power Holdings, Inc.) and DAKT (Daktronics, Inc.) are both stocks. FLUX operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials), while DAKT operates in Computer Hardware (Technology). Over the past 10 years, FLUX returned 5.47%/yr vs 13.76%/yr for DAKT. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FLUX vs. DAKT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLUX achieves a -37.79% return, which is significantly lower than DAKT's 1.72% return. Over the past 10 years, FLUX has underperformed DAKT with an annualized return of 5.47%, while DAKT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.76% annualized return.
FLUX
- 1D
- -1.85%
- 1M
- -22.54%
- YTD
- -37.79%
- 6M
- -41.90%
- 1Y
- -42.33%
- 3Y*
- -41.32%
- 5Y*
- -40.92%
- 10Y*
- 5.47%
DAKT
- 1D
- -3.73%
- 1M
- -0.89%
- YTD
- 1.72%
- 6M
- 6.35%
- 1Y
- 35.24%
- 3Y*
- 49.40%
- 5Y*
- 24.85%
- 10Y*
- 13.76%
FLUX vs. DAKT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLUX Flux Power Holdings, Inc. | -37.79% | -19.62% | -61.56% | 3.53% | -7.46% | -75.12% | 87.60% | -47.49% | 337.50% | 875.61% |
DAKT Daktronics, Inc. | 1.72% | 17.26% | 98.82% | 200.71% | -44.16% | 7.91% | -22.41% | -15.05% | -16.17% | -12.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLUX and DAKT is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2002 | 0.05 |
The correlation between FLUX and DAKT shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (all time) to 0.17 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FLUX:
$16.86M
DAKT:
$996.01M
FLUX:
-$0.35
DAKT:
$0.55
FLUX:
0.28
DAKT:
1.24
FLUX:
3.66
DAKT:
3.39
FLUX:
$50.62M
DAKT:
$802.65M
FLUX:
$16.23M
DAKT:
$213.67M
FLUX:
-$212.00K
DAKT:
$41.38M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLUX vs. DAKT — Risk / Return Rank
FLUX
DAKT
FLUX vs. DAKT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flux Power Holdings, Inc. (FLUX) and Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLUX | DAKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.18 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.48 | 1.13 | -1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.65 | 1.85 | -2.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLUX vs. DAKT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLUX drawdown since its inception was -99.95%, which is greater than DAKT's maximum drawdown of -92.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLUX and DAKT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLUX | DAKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.95% | -92.96% | -6.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -88.14% | -31.34% | -56.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -88.14% | -42.00% | -46.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -93.50% | -73.48% | -20.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -97.42% | -82.34% | -15.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.21% | -27.48% | -71.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -92.10% | -50.10% | -42.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 64.90% | 19.05% | +45.85% |
Volatility
FLUX vs. DAKT - Volatility Comparison
Flux Power Holdings, Inc. (FLUX) has a higher volatility of 17.83% compared to Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT) at 13.24%. This indicates that FLUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DAKT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLUX | DAKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.83% | 13.24% | +4.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 65.95% | 29.83% | +36.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 130.15% | 47.60% | +82.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 93.08% | 52.29% | +40.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 313.27% | 45.92% | +267.35% |
Dividends
FLUX vs. DAKT - Dividend Comparison
Neither FLUX nor DAKT has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAKT Daktronics, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.07% | 3.61% | 3.78% | 3.07% | 3.18% | 4.59% |
FLUX Flux Power Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
FLUX vs. DAKT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Flux Power Holdings, Inc. and Daktronics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FLUX vs. DAKT - Profitability Comparison
FLUX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flux Power Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.80M and revenue of 6.59M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.3%.
DAKT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Daktronics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 43.63M and revenue of 181.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.0%.
FLUX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flux Power Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.18M and revenue of 6.59M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.9%.
DAKT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Daktronics, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.92M and revenue of 181.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.1%.
FLUX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flux Power Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of -3.18M and revenue of 6.59M, resulting in a net margin of -48.2%.
DAKT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Daktronics, Inc. reported a net income of 3.01M and revenue of 181.87M, resulting in a net margin of 1.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FLUX and DAKT have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLUX has higher volatility (17.83%) compared to DAKT (13.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLUX dropped -99.95% vs DAKT's -92.96%.
DAKT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.75 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLUX and DAKT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer