PortfoliosLab logo
KE vs. FN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between KE and FN is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

KE vs. FN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kimball Electronics, Inc. (KE) and Fabrinet (FN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

KE:

-0.43

FN:

-0.11

Sortino Ratio

KE:

-0.33

FN:

0.37

Omega Ratio

KE:

0.96

FN:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

KE:

-0.30

FN:

-0.09

Martin Ratio

KE:

-0.72

FN:

-0.18

Ulcer Index

KE:

24.43%

FN:

17.46%

Daily Std Dev

KE:

45.14%

FN:

63.36%

Max Drawdown

KE:

-58.50%

FN:

-70.46%

Current Drawdown

KE:

-41.37%

FN:

-25.92%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KE:

$366.36M

FN:

$7.95B

EPS

KE:

$0.32

FN:

$8.95

PE Ratio

KE:

46.63

FN:

24.68

PEG Ratio

KE:

0.00

FN:

1.19

PS Ratio

KE:

0.23

FN:

2.34

PB Ratio

KE:

0.68

FN:

3.96

Total Revenue (TTM)

KE:

$1.54B

FN:

$3.26B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KE:

$109.22M

FN:

$397.42M

EBITDA (TTM)

KE:

$65.75M

FN:

$326.13M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KE achieves a -2.62% return, which is significantly higher than FN's -7.85% return. Over the past 10 years, KE has underperformed FN with an annualized return of 3.22%, while FN has yielded a comparatively higher 27.07% annualized return.


KE

YTD

-2.62%

1M

28.90%

6M

-12.18%

1Y

-19.22%

5Y*

6.98%

10Y*

3.22%

FN

YTD

-7.85%

1M

0.36%

6M

-25.25%

1Y

-7.06%

5Y*

27.06%

10Y*

27.07%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

KE vs. FN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KE is 3030
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KE is 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KE is 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KE is 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KE is 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KE is 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

FN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FN is 4747
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FN is 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FN is 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FN is 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FN is 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FN is 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

KE vs. FN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimball Electronics, Inc. (KE) and Fabrinet (FN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current KE Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is lower than the FN Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KE and FN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

KE vs. FN - Dividend Comparison

Neither KE nor FN has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

KE vs. FN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KE drawdown since its inception was -58.50%, smaller than the maximum FN drawdown of -70.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KE and FN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

KE vs. FN - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...

Financials

KE vs. FN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kimball Electronics, Inc. and Fabrinet. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00M800.00M900.00M20212022202320242025
374.61M
871.80M
(KE) Total Revenue
(FN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KE vs. FN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kimball Electronics, Inc. and Fabrinet over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

6.0%8.0%10.0%12.0%20212022202320242025
7.2%
11.7%
(KE) Gross Margin
(FN) Gross Margin
KE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Kimball Electronics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 26.90M and revenue of 374.61M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.2%.

FN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Fabrinet reported a gross profit of 102.18M and revenue of 871.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.7%.

KE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Kimball Electronics, Inc. reported an operating income of 13.74M and revenue of 374.61M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.7%.

FN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Fabrinet reported an operating income of 78.86M and revenue of 871.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.1%.

KE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Kimball Electronics, Inc. reported a net income of 3.82M and revenue of 374.61M, resulting in a net margin of 1.0%.

FN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Fabrinet reported a net income of 81.29M and revenue of 871.80M, resulting in a net margin of 9.3%.