PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KE vs. SANM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KE vs. SANM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kimball Electronics, Inc. (KE) and Sanmina Corporation (SANM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KE achieves a -11.11% return, which is significantly lower than SANM's 23.65% return. Over the past 10 years, KE has underperformed SANM with an annualized return of 7.13%, while SANM has yielded a comparatively higher 22.13% annualized return.


KE

1D
0.61%
1M
-1.43%
6M
-18.14%
YTD
-11.11%
1Y
35.43%
3Y*
-6.39%
5Y*
3.93%
10Y*
7.13%
ALL TIME*
14.22%

SANM

1D
1.13%
1M
-15.57%
6M
30.97%
YTD
23.65%
1Y
67.23%
3Y*
47.63%
5Y*
37.02%
10Y*
22.13%
ALL TIME*
11.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.65M$4.93M$4.88M
$205.77M$175.11M$259.59M

KE vs. SANM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KE
Kimball Electronics, Inc.
-11.11%48.53%-30.50%19.30%3.81%36.09%-8.89%13.30%-15.12%0.27%
SANM
Sanmina Corporation
23.65%98.32%47.30%-10.33%38.18%30.01%-6.86%42.31%-27.09%-9.96%

Correlation

The correlation between KE and SANM is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2014

0.53

The correlation between KE and SANM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KE:

$594.73M

SANM:

$9.95B

EPS

KE:

$1.05

SANM:

$5.59

PE Ratio

KE:

23.56

SANM:

33.19

PS Ratio

KE:

0.43

SANM:

0.80

Total Revenue (TTM)

KE:

$1.44B

SANM:

$12.76B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KE:

$115.15M

SANM:

$1.15B

EBITDA (TTM)

KE:

$77.66M

SANM:

$665.39M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KE vs. SANM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KE
KE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
KE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
KE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
KE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
KE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

SANM
SANM Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SANM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SANM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SANM Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
SANM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SANM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KE vs. SANM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimball Electronics, Inc. (KE) and Sanmina Corporation (SANM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KESANMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.21

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.01

1.43

-0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.71

3.84

-2.13

KE vs. SANM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KE Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is comparable to the SANM Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KE and SANM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KE vs. SANM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KE drawdown since its inception was -58.50%, smaller than the maximum SANM drawdown of -99.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KE and SANM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KESANMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.50%

-99.66%

+41.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.69%

-42.05%

+10.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.50%

-42.05%

-16.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.50%

-42.05%

-16.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.50%

-55.85%

-2.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.35%

-47.58%

+22.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.82%

-71.29%

+47.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.65%

15.66%

+2.99%

Volatility

KE vs. SANM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kimball Electronics, Inc. (KE) is 11.33%, while Sanmina Corporation (SANM) has a volatility of 28.93%. This indicates that KE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SANM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KESANMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.33%

28.93%

-17.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.27%

50.39%

-10.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.19%

70.43%

-20.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.93%

46.37%

-5.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.91%

42.73%

-2.82%

Dividends

KE vs. SANM - Dividend Comparison

Neither KE nor SANM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

KE vs. SANM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kimball Electronics, Inc. and Sanmina Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

KE vs. SANM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kimball Electronics, Inc. and Sanmina Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

KE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kimball Electronics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 27.82M and revenue of 352.92M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.9%.

SANM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sanmina Corporation reported a gross profit of 363.31M and revenue of 3.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.5%.

KE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kimball Electronics, Inc. reported an operating income of 11.76M and revenue of 352.92M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.3%.

SANM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sanmina Corporation reported an operating income of 221.23M and revenue of 3.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.4%.

KE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kimball Electronics, Inc. reported a net income of 5.72M and revenue of 352.92M, resulting in a net margin of 1.6%.

SANM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sanmina Corporation reported a net income of 117.13M and revenue of 3.46B, resulting in a net margin of 3.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KE and SANM have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SANM has higher volatility (28.93%) compared to KE (11.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KE dropped -58.50% vs SANM's -99.66%.

SANM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KE and SANM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer