KE vs. SANM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Kimball Electronics, Inc. (KE) and Sanmina Corporation (SANM).

Performance

KE vs. SANM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kimball Electronics, Inc. (KE) and Sanmina Corporation (SANM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

KE vs. SANM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
KE Kimball Electronics, Inc.	-14.85%	48.53%	-30.50%	19.30%	3.81%	36.09%	-8.89%	13.30%	-15.12%	0.27%
SANM Sanmina Corporation	-13.61%	98.32%	47.30%	-10.33%	38.18%	30.01%	-6.86%	42.31%	-27.09%	-9.96%

Fundamentals

Market Cap KE : $588.06M SANM : $7.20B
EPS KE : $0.97 SANM : $4.20
PE Ratio KE : 24.41 SANM : 30.88
PS Ratio KE : 0.40 SANM : 0.76
Total Revenue (TTM) KE : $1.46B SANM : $9.31B
Gross Profit (TTM) KE : $114.24M SANM : $790.80M
EBITDA (TTM) KE : $77.54M SANM : $429.31M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KE achieves a -14.85% return, which is significantly lower than SANM's -13.61% return. Over the past 10 years, KE has underperformed SANM with an annualized return of 7.67%, while SANM has yielded a comparatively higher 18.71% annualized return.

KE

• 1D: 1.50%
• 1M: -5.20%
• YTD: -14.85%
• 6M: -20.66%
• 1Y: 44.01%
• 3Y*: -0.57%
• 5Y*: -1.78%
• 10Y*: 7.67%

SANM

• 1D: 4.52%
• 1M: -16.50%
• YTD: -13.61%
• 6M: 12.62%
• 1Y: 70.18%
• 3Y*: 28.58%
• 5Y*: 25.20%
• 10Y*: 18.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

KE vs. SANM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KE

KE Risk / Return Rank: 69
KE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
KE Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
KE Omega Ratio Rank: 71
KE Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
KE Martin Ratio Rank: 69

SANM

SANM Risk / Return Rank: 77
SANM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
SANM Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
SANM Omega Ratio Rank: 77
SANM Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
SANM Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KE vs. SANM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimball Electronics, Inc. (KE) and Sanmina Corporation (SANM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KE	SANM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.79	1.09	-0.30
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.43	1.77	-0.35
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.26	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.36	2.11	-0.75
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.12	5.71	-2.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KE vs. SANM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KE Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is comparable to the SANM Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KE and SANM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KE	SANM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79	1.09	-0.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.04	0.59	-0.64
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.19	0.46	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.16	+0.11

Correlation

The correlation between KE and SANM is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

KE vs. SANM - Dividend Comparison

Neither KE nor SANM has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

KE vs. SANM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KE drawdown since its inception was -58.50%, smaller than the maximum SANM drawdown of -99.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KE and SANM.

Drawdown Indicators

	KE	SANM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.50%	-99.66%	+41.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.69%	-32.69%	+1.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-58.50%	-33.92%	-24.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.50%	-55.85%	-2.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.49%	-63.38%	+34.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.85%	-71.63%	+47.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.84%	12.10%	+1.74%

Volatility

KE vs. SANM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kimball Electronics, Inc. (KE) is 13.19%, while Sanmina Corporation (SANM) has a volatility of 17.43%. This indicates that KE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SANM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KE	SANM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.19%	17.43%	-4.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.05%	54.34%	-14.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	56.31%	64.71%	-8.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.44%	42.63%	-2.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.61%	41.19%	-1.58%

Financials

KE vs. SANM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kimball Electronics, Inc. and Sanmina Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

KE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kimball Electronics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 27.87M and revenue of 341.28M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 8.2%.

SANM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sanmina Corporation reported a gross profit of 242.36M and revenue of 3.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.6%.

KE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kimball Electronics, Inc. reported an operating income of 10.77M and revenue of 341.28M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.2%.

SANM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sanmina Corporation reported an operating income of 73.60M and revenue of 3.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.3%.

KE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kimball Electronics, Inc. reported a net income of 3.64M and revenue of 341.28M, resulting in a net margin of 1.1%.

SANM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sanmina Corporation reported a net income of 49.29M and revenue of 3.19B, resulting in a net margin of 1.6%.