KCOP vs. IBIC
KCOP (Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KCOP is a Copper fund actively managed by Kurv, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. KCOP is actively managed, while IBIC is passively managed. Their -0.40 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. KCOP charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.
Performance
KCOP vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
KCOP
- 1D
- 2.74%
- 1M
- 9.19%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
IBIC
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- 6M
- 2.33%
- YTD
- 2.63%
- 1Y
- 3.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.22%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $985.11K | $822.88K | $536.84K | |
| $323.94K | $335.89K | $555.57K |
KCOP vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
KCOP Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF | 4.55% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 2.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between KCOP and IBIC is -0.40, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2026 | -0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KCOP vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank
KCOP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IBIC
KCOP vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF (KCOP) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KCOP | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 2.07 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 14.92 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 50.81 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KCOP vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KCOP drawdown since its inception was -21.55%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCOP and IBIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KCOP | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.55% | -0.90% | -20.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.37% | -0.12% | -4.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.58% | -0.10% | -9.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.08% | — |
Volatility
KCOP vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KCOP | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.23% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.69% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.38% | 0.88% | +41.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.38% | 1.54% | +40.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.38% | 1.54% | +40.84% |
KCOP vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison
KCOP has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
KCOP vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison
KCOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.12%, more than IBIC's 4.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 4.62% | 4.43% | 4.65% | 0.83% |
KCOP Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF | 6.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KCOP and IBIC have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for KCOP.
KCOP has the higher dividend yield at 6.12%, compared with 4.62% for IBIC.
KCOP is categorized as Copper, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Kurv and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for KCOP and 0.10% for IBIC.
Find the right allocation for KCOP and IBIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer