KCE vs. SMH
KCE (SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KCE is a Financials Equities fund tracking the S&P Capital Markets Select Industry Index, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, KCE returned 17.65%/yr vs 37.49%/yr for SMH. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
KCE vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KCE achieves a 3.66% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 72.15% return. Over the past 10 years, KCE has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 17.65%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 37.49% annualized return.
KCE
- 1D
- 1.60%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 3.66%
- 6M
- 2.73%
- 1Y
- 16.75%
- 3Y*
- 24.58%
- 5Y*
- 12.87%
- 10Y*
- 17.65%
SMH
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- 7.20%
- YTD
- 72.15%
- 6M
- 75.62%
- 1Y
- 141.99%
- 3Y*
- 60.05%
- 5Y*
- 38.42%
- 10Y*
- 37.49%
KCE vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KCE SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF | 3.66% | 10.76% | 37.51% | 32.04% | -22.14% | 40.05% | 30.82% | 27.13% | -15.63% | 32.01% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 72.15% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between KCE and SMH is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2005 | 0.63 |
The correlation between KCE and SMH shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
KCE vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KCE
SMH
Financial Services
-
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
KCE
SMH
-
Technology
KCE
SMH
Basic Materials
KCE
-
SMH
-
Communication Services
KCE
-
SMH
-
Consumer Cyclical
KCE
-
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
KCE
-
SMH
-
Energy
KCE
-
SMH
-
Healthcare
KCE
-
SMH
-
Industrials
KCE
-
SMH
-
Real Estate
KCE
-
SMH
-
Utilities
KCE
-
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KCE vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
KCE
SMH
KCE vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KCE | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.60 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | 9.18 | -8.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.14 | 33.74 | -31.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KCE vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KCE drawdown since its inception was -74.00%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCE and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KCE | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.00% | -84.96% | +10.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.44% | -14.93% | -2.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.31% | -35.74% | +9.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.45% | -45.30% | +10.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.78% | -45.30% | +4.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.75% | -2.81% | -0.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.78% | -41.04% | +18.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.70% | 4.06% | +2.64% |
Volatility
KCE vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE) is 6.04%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 16.25%. This indicates that KCE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KCE | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.04% | 16.25% | -10.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.31% | 27.73% | -12.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.12% | 33.20% | -13.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.08% | 35.47% | -12.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.10% | 32.82% | -9.72% |
KCE vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both KCE and SMH have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
KCE vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
KCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than SMH's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KCE SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF | 1.67% | 1.63% | 1.56% | 1.82% | 2.42% | 1.53% | 2.20% | 2.32% | 2.67% | 1.95% | 2.30% | 2.43% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KCE and SMH have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (16.25%) compared to KCE (6.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KCE dropped -74.00% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 37.49% vs 17.65% for KCE. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, KCE has been the lower-risk option at 6.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 37.49% return vs 17.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KCE and SMH have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
KCE has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 0.18% for SMH.
KCE is categorized as Financials Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. KCE tracks S&P Capital Markets Select Industry Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and VanEck.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.13 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KCE and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer