KCCA vs. KBUF

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

KCCA (KraneShares California Carbon Allowance Strategy ETF) and KBUF (KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KCCA is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P Carbon Credit CCA Index, while KBUF is a Options Trading fund actively managed by KraneShares. KCCA is passively managed, while KBUF is actively managed. Over the past year, KCCA returned 16.63% vs -5.81% for KBUF. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. KCCA charges 0.91%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for KBUF.

Performance

KCCA vs. KBUF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares California Carbon Allowance Strategy ETF (KCCA) and KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KCCA achieves a -1.01% return, which is significantly higher than KBUF's -12.71% return.

KCCA

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 11.42%
• YTD: -1.01%
• 6M: 2.68%
• 1Y: 16.63%
• 3Y*: -2.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KBUF

• 1D: -1.55%
• 1M: -6.73%
• YTD: -12.71%
• 6M: -13.32%
• 1Y: -5.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KCCA vs. KBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
KCCA KraneShares California Carbon Allowance Strategy ETF	-1.01%	-11.81%	-18.47%
KBUF KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF	-12.71%	18.04%	16.58%

Correlation

The correlation between KCCA and KBUF is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2024	-0.01

KCCA vs. KBUF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KCCA	KBUF
Financial Services	27.1%	2.0%
Technology	16.2%	3.6%
Industrials	15.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	38.4%
Energy	7.9%	-
Healthcare	7.6%	6.9%
Communication Services	7.3%	40.1%
Utilities	4.5%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.1%	4.3%
Basic Materials	-	-
Real Estate	-	4.8%

Return for Risk

KCCA vs. KBUF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KCCA

KCCA Risk / Return Rank: 30
KCCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
KCCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
KCCA Omega Ratio Rank: 39
KCCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
KCCA Martin Ratio Rank: 19

KBUF

KBUF Risk / Return Rank: 5
KBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
KBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
KBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 5
KBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
KBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KCCA vs. KBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares California Carbon Allowance Strategy ETF (KCCA) and KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KCCA	KBUF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.07	-0.44	+1.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.66	-0.54	+2.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	0.94	+0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.09	-0.33	+1.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.91	-0.76	+2.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KCCA vs. KBUF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KCCA Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is higher than the KBUF Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KCCA and KBUF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KCCA	KBUF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.07	-0.44	+1.52
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.11	0.58	-0.69

Drawdowns

KCCA vs. KBUF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KCCA drawdown since its inception was -40.88%, which is greater than KBUF's maximum drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCCA and KBUF.

Drawdown Indicators

	KCCA	KBUF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.88%	-17.87%	-23.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.30%	-17.87%	+2.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-40.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.82%	-17.87%	-11.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.45%	-4.20%	-17.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.71%	7.66%	+1.05%

Volatility

KCCA vs. KBUF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares California Carbon Allowance Strategy ETF (KCCA) is 3.26%, while KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) has a volatility of 5.69%. This indicates that KCCA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KBUF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KCCA	KBUF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.26%	5.69%	-2.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.20%	10.62%	-0.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.59%	13.16%	+2.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.01%	14.36%	+9.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.01%	14.36%	+9.65%

KCCA vs. KBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison

KCCA has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than KBUF's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

KCCA vs. KBUF - Dividend Comparison

KCCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than KBUF's 8.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
KBUF KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF	8.61%	7.51%	3.53%	0.00%	0.00%
KCCA KraneShares California Carbon Allowance Strategy ETF	2.90%	2.87%	30.58%	3.12%	0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KCCA and KBUF in my portfolio?

KCCA and KBUF have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KCCA or KBUF?

KBUF has higher volatility (5.69%) compared to KCCA (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KCCA dropped -40.88% vs KBUF's -17.87%.

Which ETF is better, KCCA or KBUF?

On 1-year performance, KCCA leads with 16.63% vs -5.81% for KBUF. On fees, KCCA is cheaper at 0.91% per year. On volatility, KCCA has been the lower-risk option at 3.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KCCA or KBUF?

Over the 1-year period, KCCA has performed better with a 16.63% return vs -5.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KCCA or KBUF?

KCCA is cheaper with a 0.91% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for KBUF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KCCA or KBUF?

KBUF has the higher dividend yield at 8.61%, compared with 2.90% for KCCA.

What is the main difference between KCCA and KBUF?

KCCA is categorized as Commodities, while KBUF is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.91% for KCCA and 0.95% for KBUF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KCCA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.