KC vs. SIMO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (KC) and Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO).

Performance

KC vs. SIMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (KC) and Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

KC vs. SIMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
KC Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited	29.21%	-1.43%	177.51%	-1.31%	-75.68%	-63.83%	82.68%
SIMO Silicon Motion Technology Corporation	21.60%	76.91%	-8.94%	-4.91%	-30.38%	101.83%	11.20%

Fundamentals

EPS KC : -$3.37 SIMO : $21.91
PS Ratio KC : 0.39 SIMO : 0.71
Total Revenue (TTM) KC : $9.48B SIMO : $885.63M
Gross Profit (TTM) KC : $1.49B SIMO : $427.51M
EBITDA (TTM) KC : $1.97B SIMO : $123.21M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KC achieves a 29.21% return, which is significantly higher than SIMO's 21.60% return.

KC

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: -0.89%
• YTD: 29.21%
• 6M: -10.46%
• 1Y: -6.96%
• 3Y*: 14.54%
• 5Y*: -21.19%
• 10Y*: —

SIMO

• 1D: 6.49%
• 1M: -13.11%
• YTD: 21.60%
• 6M: 19.58%
• 1Y: 127.84%
• 3Y*: 22.70%
• 5Y*: 14.57%
• 10Y*: 14.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

KC vs. SIMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KC

KC Risk / Return Rank: 39
KC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
KC Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
KC Omega Ratio Rank: 40
KC Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
KC Martin Ratio Rank: 39

SIMO

SIMO Risk / Return Rank: 92
SIMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
SIMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
SIMO Omega Ratio Rank: 90
SIMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
SIMO Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KC vs. SIMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (KC) and Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KC	SIMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.09	2.45	-2.54
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.48	2.83	-2.35
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.39	-0.33
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.11	4.84	-4.95
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.19	13.26	-13.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KC vs. SIMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KC Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is lower than the SIMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KC and SIMO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KC	SIMO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09	2.45	-2.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.21	0.33	-0.53
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.34	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.09	0.26	-0.36

Correlation

The correlation between KC and SIMO is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

KC vs. SIMO - Dividend Comparison

KC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SIMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KC Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SIMO Silicon Motion Technology Corporation	1.78%	2.16%	3.70%	0.82%	2.31%	1.62%	2.89%	2.45%	3.45%	1.68%	1.51%	1.88%

Drawdowns

KC vs. SIMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KC drawdown since its inception was -97.36%, roughly equal to the maximum SIMO drawdown of -93.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KC and SIMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	KC	SIMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.36%	-93.19%	-4.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.81%	-26.26%	-14.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-96.10%	-56.49%	-39.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-56.49%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-81.46%	-21.48%	-59.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-74.53%	-32.63%	-41.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	22.92%	9.59%	+13.33%

Volatility

KC vs. SIMO - Volatility Comparison

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (KC) has a higher volatility of 28.41% compared to Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) at 15.94%. This indicates that KC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KC	SIMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	28.41%	15.94%	+12.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	51.48%	39.62%	+11.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	79.60%	52.50%	+27.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	103.26%	44.79%	+58.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	101.12%	42.05%	+59.07%

Financials

KC vs. SIMO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited and Silicon Motion Technology Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

KC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 458.93M and revenue of 2.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.9%.

SIMO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Silicon Motion Technology Corporation reported a gross profit of 136.77M and revenue of 278.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.1%.

KC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited reported an operating income of -65.53M and revenue of 2.72B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.4%.

SIMO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Silicon Motion Technology Corporation reported an operating income of 31.71M and revenue of 278.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.4%.

KC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited reported a net income of -158.03M and revenue of 2.72B, resulting in a net margin of -5.8%.

SIMO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Silicon Motion Technology Corporation reported a net income of 47.75M and revenue of 278.46M, resulting in a net margin of 17.2%.