KC vs. SIMO

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

KC (Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited) and SIMO (Silicon Motion Technology Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — KC in Software - Application, SIMO in Semiconductors. Over the past 5 years, KC returned -18.81%/yr vs 39.00%/yr for SIMO. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

KC vs. SIMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (KC) and Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KC achieves a 32.50% return, which is significantly lower than SIMO's 226.90% return.

KC

• 1D: 2.78%
• 1M: -8.67%
• YTD: 32.50%
• 6M: 18.41%
• 1Y: 21.78%
• 3Y*: 35.89%
• 5Y*: -18.81%
• 10Y*: —

SIMO

• 1D: 12.39%
• 1M: 28.73%
• YTD: 226.90%
• 6M: 241.92%
• 1Y: 382.70%
• 3Y*: 71.55%
• 5Y*: 39.00%
• 10Y*: 23.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KC vs. SIMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
KC Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited	32.50%	-1.43%	177.51%	-1.31%	-75.68%	-63.83%	82.68%
SIMO Silicon Motion Technology Corporation	226.90%	76.91%	-8.94%	-4.91%	-30.38%	101.83%	11.20%

Correlation

The correlation between KC and SIMO is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2020	0.24

Fundamentals

Market Cap KC : $4.16B SIMO : $2.55B
EPS KC : -$3.42 SIMO : $17.93
PS Ratio KC : 0.38 SIMO : 2.54
PB Ratio KC : 0.46 SIMO : 2.82
Total Revenue (TTM) KC : $10.29B SIMO : $997.60M
Gross Profit (TTM) KC : $1.53B SIMO : $485.91M
EBITDA (TTM) KC : -$410.92M SIMO : $146.89M

Return for Risk

KC vs. SIMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KC

KC Risk / Return Rank: 52
KC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
KC Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
KC Omega Ratio Rank: 50
KC Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
KC Martin Ratio Rank: 51

SIMO

SIMO Risk / Return Rank: 99
SIMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
SIMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
SIMO Omega Ratio Rank: 98
SIMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
SIMO Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KC vs. SIMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (KC) and Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KC	SIMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.29	5.65	-5.36
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.07	5.97	-4.90
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.78	-0.66
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.56	15.28	-14.73
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.04	46.82	-45.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KC vs. SIMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KC Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is lower than the SIMO Sharpe Ratio of 5.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KC and SIMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KC	SIMO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29	5.65	-5.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.18	0.79	-0.97
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.53	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.09	0.36	-0.45

Drawdowns

KC vs. SIMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KC drawdown since its inception was -97.36%, roughly equal to the maximum SIMO drawdown of -93.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KC and SIMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	KC	SIMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.36%	-93.19%	-4.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.81%	-26.26%	-14.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-70.77%	-52.84%	-17.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-95.31%	-56.49%	-38.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-56.49%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-80.99%	0.00%	-80.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-74.64%	-32.40%	-42.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.88%	8.57%	+13.31%

Volatility

KC vs. SIMO - Volatility Comparison

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (KC) has a higher volatility of 27.88% compared to Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) at 19.78%. This indicates that KC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KC	SIMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.88%	19.78%	+8.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	56.09%	55.54%	+0.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	76.29%	68.40%	+7.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	103.82%	49.87%	+53.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	100.56%	44.98%	+55.58%

Dividends

KC vs. SIMO - Dividend Comparison

KC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SIMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KC Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SIMO Silicon Motion Technology Corporation	0.66%	2.16%	3.70%	0.82%	2.31%	1.62%	2.89%	2.45%	3.45%	1.68%	1.51%	1.88%

Financials

KC vs. SIMO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited and Silicon Motion Technology Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

KC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 345.75M and revenue of 2.70B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.8%.

SIMO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Silicon Motion Technology Corporation reported a gross profit of 136.77M and revenue of 278.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.1%.

KC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited reported an operating income of -166.11M and revenue of 2.70B, resulting in an operating margin of -6.1%.

SIMO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Silicon Motion Technology Corporation reported an operating income of 31.71M and revenue of 278.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.4%.

KC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited reported a net income of -343.82M and revenue of 2.70B, resulting in a net margin of -12.7%.

SIMO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Silicon Motion Technology Corporation reported a net income of 47.75M and revenue of 278.46M, resulting in a net margin of 17.2%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KC and SIMO in my portfolio?

KC and SIMO have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KC or SIMO?

KC has higher volatility (27.88%) compared to SIMO (19.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KC dropped -97.36% vs SIMO's -93.19%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SIMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.65 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.