KC vs. VLN
KC (Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited) and VLN (Valens Semiconductor Ltd.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — KC in Software - Application, VLN in Semiconductors. Over the past 3 years, KC returned 32.64%/yr vs 11.07%/yr for VLN. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KC vs. VLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KC achieves a 23.21% return, which is significantly lower than VLN's 126.76% return.
KC
- 1D
- -7.01%
- 1M
- -16.24%
- YTD
- 23.21%
- 6M
- 10.88%
- 1Y
- 14.47%
- 3Y*
- 32.64%
- 5Y*
- -20.11%
- 10Y*
- —
VLN
- 1D
- -2.72%
- 1M
- 43.11%
- YTD
- 126.76%
- 6M
- 92.81%
- 1Y
- 47.71%
- 3Y*
- 11.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KC vs. VLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KC Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited | 23.21% | -1.43% | 177.51% | -1.31% | -75.68% | -43.55% |
VLN Valens Semiconductor Ltd. | 126.76% | -45.38% | 6.12% | -54.38% | -30.26% | 16.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between KC and VLN is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2021 | 0.16 |
Fundamentals
KC:
$3.87B
VLN:
$338.25M
KC:
-$3.42
VLN:
-$0.31
KC:
0.35
VLN:
4.70
KC:
0.43
VLN:
3.37
KC:
$10.29B
VLN:
$70.66M
KC:
$1.53B
VLN:
$43.99M
KC:
-$410.92M
VLN:
-$30.36M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KC vs. VLN — Risk / Return Rank
KC
VLN
KC vs. VLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (KC) and Valens Semiconductor Ltd. (VLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KC | VLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.20 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | 0.74 | -0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.66 | 1.17 | -0.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KC | VLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 | 0.46 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.10 | -0.19 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
KC vs. VLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KC drawdown since its inception was -97.36%, which is greater than VLN's maximum drawdown of -90.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KC and VLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KC | VLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.36% | -90.13% | -7.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.81% | -64.42% | +23.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.77% | -67.92% | -2.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -82.32% | -71.38% | -10.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.65% | -71.13% | -3.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.96% | 40.82% | -18.86% |
Volatility
KC vs. VLN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (KC) is 28.62%, while Valens Semiconductor Ltd. (VLN) has a volatility of 32.50%. This indicates that KC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KC | VLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.62% | 32.50% | -3.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.39% | 78.87% | -22.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 76.63% | 103.68% | -27.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 103.85% | 77.06% | +26.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 100.57% | 77.06% | +23.51% |
Dividends
KC vs. VLN - Dividend Comparison
Neither KC nor VLN has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
KC vs. VLN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited and Valens Semiconductor Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KC vs. VLN - Profitability Comparison
KC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 345.75M and revenue of 2.70B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.8%.
VLN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Valens Semiconductor Ltd. reported a gross profit of 10.49M and revenue of 16.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.2%.
KC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited reported an operating income of -166.11M and revenue of 2.70B, resulting in an operating margin of -6.1%.
VLN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Valens Semiconductor Ltd. reported an operating income of -9.22M and revenue of 16.86M, resulting in an operating margin of -54.7%.
KC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited reported a net income of -343.82M and revenue of 2.70B, resulting in a net margin of -12.7%.
VLN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Valens Semiconductor Ltd. reported a net income of -8.29M and revenue of 16.86M, resulting in a net margin of -49.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KC and VLN have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VLN has higher volatility (32.50%) compared to KC (28.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KC dropped -97.36% vs VLN's -90.13%.
VLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.46 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KC and VLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer