KC vs. IREN

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (KC) and Iris Energy Limited (IREN).

Performance

KC vs. IREN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (KC) and Iris Energy Limited (IREN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

KC vs. IREN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
KC Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited	29.21%	-1.43%	177.51%	-1.31%	-75.68%	-30.89%
IREN Iris Energy Limited	-9.24%	284.62%	37.34%	472.00%	-92.27%	-33.87%

Fundamentals

Market Cap KC : $4.05B IREN : $10.22B
EPS KC : -$3.37 IREN : -$0.06
PS Ratio KC : 0.39 IREN : 11.28
PB Ratio KC : 0.43 IREN : 4.07
Total Revenue (TTM) KC : $9.48B IREN : $760.38M
Gross Profit (TTM) KC : $1.49B IREN : $461.29M
EBITDA (TTM) KC : $1.97B IREN : $461.18M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KC achieves a 29.21% return, which is significantly higher than IREN's -9.24% return.

KC

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: -0.89%
• YTD: 29.21%
• 6M: -10.46%
• 1Y: -6.96%
• 3Y*: 14.54%
• 5Y*: -21.19%
• 10Y*: —

IREN

• 1D: 8.41%
• 1M: -16.29%
• YTD: -9.24%
• 6M: -26.96%
• 1Y: 462.89%
• 3Y*: 123.76%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

KC vs. IREN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KC

KC Risk / Return Rank: 39
KC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
KC Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
KC Omega Ratio Rank: 40
KC Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
KC Martin Ratio Rank: 39

IREN

IREN Risk / Return Rank: 96
IREN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
IREN Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
IREN Omega Ratio Rank: 92
IREN Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
IREN Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KC vs. IREN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (KC) and Iris Energy Limited (IREN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KC	IREN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.09	4.74	-4.83
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.48	3.68	-3.20
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.43	-0.38
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.11	7.93	-8.04
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.19	17.28	-17.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KC vs. IREN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KC Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is lower than the IREN Sharpe Ratio of 4.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KC and IREN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KC	IREN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09	4.74	-4.83
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.21	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.09	0.07	-0.16

Correlation

The correlation between KC and IREN is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

KC vs. IREN - Dividend Comparison

Neither KC nor IREN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

KC vs. IREN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KC drawdown since its inception was -97.36%, roughly equal to the maximum IREN drawdown of -95.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KC and IREN.

Drawdown Indicators

	KC	IREN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.36%	-95.73%	-1.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.81%	-58.62%	+17.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-96.10%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-81.46%	-55.14%	-26.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-74.53%	-63.97%	-10.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	22.92%	26.89%	-3.97%

Volatility

KC vs. IREN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (KC) is 28.41%, while Iris Energy Limited (IREN) has a volatility of 30.29%. This indicates that KC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IREN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KC	IREN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	28.41%	30.29%	-1.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	51.48%	77.56%	-26.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	79.60%	98.40%	-18.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	103.26%	119.14%	-15.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	101.12%	119.14%	-18.02%

Financials