PortfoliosLab logo
KC vs. IREN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between KC and IREN is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

KC vs. IREN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (KC) and Iris Energy Limited (IREN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

KC:

2.49

IREN:

0.12

Sortino Ratio

KC:

3.16

IREN:

0.92

Omega Ratio

KC:

1.37

IREN:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

KC:

2.91

IREN:

0.08

Martin Ratio

KC:

13.13

IREN:

0.16

Ulcer Index

KC:

21.53%

IREN:

39.93%

Daily Std Dev

KC:

114.60%

IREN:

109.26%

Max Drawdown

KC:

-97.36%

IREN:

-95.73%

Current Drawdown

KC:

-84.50%

IREN:

-66.17%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KC:

$3.28B

IREN:

$2.03B

EPS

KC:

-$1.08

IREN:

-$0.31

PS Ratio

KC:

0.42

IREN:

5.37

PB Ratio

KC:

4.54

IREN:

1.42

Total Revenue (TTM)

KC:

$8.24B

IREN:

$373.56M

Gross Profit (TTM)

KC:

$1.47B

IREN:

$342.03M

EBITDA (TTM)

KC:

-$608.24M

IREN:

$47.97M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KC achieves a 6.48% return, which is significantly higher than IREN's -14.56% return.


KC

YTD

6.48%

1M

-20.04%

6M

66.97%

1Y

294.70%

3Y*

32.33%

5Y*

-11.12%

10Y*

N/A

IREN

YTD

-14.56%

1M

31.71%

6M

-37.90%

1Y

7.70%

3Y*

12.20%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited

Iris Energy Limited

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

KC vs. IREN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KC is 9595
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KC is 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KC is 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KC is 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KC is 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KC is 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

IREN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IREN is 5757
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IREN is 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IREN is 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IREN is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IREN is 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IREN is 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

KC vs. IREN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (KC) and Iris Energy Limited (IREN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current KC Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is higher than the IREN Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KC and IREN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

KC vs. IREN - Dividend Comparison

Neither KC nor IREN has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

KC vs. IREN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KC drawdown since its inception was -97.36%, roughly equal to the maximum IREN drawdown of -95.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KC and IREN.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

KC vs. IREN - Volatility Comparison

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (KC) has a higher volatility of 21.15% compared to Iris Energy Limited (IREN) at 17.94%. This indicates that KC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IREN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

KC vs. IREN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited and Iris Energy Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20212022202320242025
2.23B
144.82M
(KC) Total Revenue
(IREN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KC vs. IREN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited and Iris Energy Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
19.1%
94.9%
(KC) Gross Margin
(IREN) Gross Margin
KC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 425.97M and revenue of 2.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.1%.

IREN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Iris Energy Limited reported a gross profit of 137.36M and revenue of 144.82M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 94.9%.

KC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited reported an operating income of -43.51M and revenue of 2.23B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.0%.

IREN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Iris Energy Limited reported an operating income of 24.62M and revenue of 144.82M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.0%.

KC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited reported a net income of -196.96M and revenue of 2.23B, resulting in a net margin of -8.8%.

IREN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Iris Energy Limited reported a net income of 24.23M and revenue of 144.82M, resulting in a net margin of 16.7%.