PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KBWP vs. USD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KBWP vs. USD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) and ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBWP achieves a -8.05% return, which is significantly lower than USD's 116.46% return. Over the past 10 years, KBWP has underperformed USD with an annualized return of 11.32%, while USD has yielded a comparatively higher 62.35% annualized return.


KBWP

1D
0.13%
1M
-2.49%
YTD
-8.05%
6M
-4.56%
1Y
-6.56%
3Y*
14.80%
5Y*
10.19%
10Y*
11.32%

USD

1D
4.76%
1M
45.27%
YTD
116.46%
6M
113.25%
1Y
300.04%
3Y*
128.54%
5Y*
71.52%
10Y*
62.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBWP vs. USD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KBWP
Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF
-8.05%11.49%30.45%7.09%10.16%20.61%-2.05%28.67%-2.76%8.86%
USD
ProShares Ultra Semiconductors
116.46%62.08%139.64%228.79%-68.57%104.27%68.16%110.37%-26.88%81.72%

Correlation

The correlation between KBWP and USD is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2010

0.23

The correlation between KBWP and USD shifts across timeframes, from -0.29 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

KBWP vs. USD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KBWP
USD

Financial Services

100.0%
27.8%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

27.4%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

KBWP
100.0%
USD
27.8%

Basic Materials

KBWP

-

USD

-

Communication Services

KBWP

-

USD

-

Consumer Cyclical

KBWP

-

USD

-

Consumer Defensive

KBWP

-

USD

-

Energy

KBWP

-

USD
0.0%

Healthcare

KBWP

-

USD

-

Industrials

KBWP

-

USD

-

Real Estate

KBWP

-

USD

-

Technology

KBWP

-

USD
27.4%

Utilities

KBWP

-

USD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KBWP vs. USD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBWP
KBWP Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
KBWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBWP Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
KBWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBWP Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

USD
USD Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
USD Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
USD Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBWP vs. USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) and ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KBWPUSDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.41

4.94

-5.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.45

3.98

-4.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.54

-0.59

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.60

9.93

-10.53

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.19

28.78

-29.96

KBWP vs. USD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBWP Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is lower than the USD Sharpe Ratio of 4.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBWP and USD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KBWPUSDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.41

4.94

-5.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.94

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.90

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.49

+0.20

Drawdowns

KBWP vs. USD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBWP drawdown since its inception was -39.76%, smaller than the maximum USD drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBWP and USD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KBWPUSDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.76%

-88.63%

+48.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.41%

-31.80%

+22.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.29%

-64.46%

+52.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.00%

-77.85%

+60.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.76%

-77.85%

+38.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.81%

0.00%

-8.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.36%

-32.36%

+28.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.78%

10.97%

-6.19%

Volatility

KBWP vs. USD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) is 4.10%, while ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD) has a volatility of 20.29%. This indicates that KBWP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KBWPUSDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.10%

20.29%

-16.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.41%

46.37%

-34.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.21%

61.29%

-45.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.52%

76.56%

-58.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.70%

69.24%

-48.54%

KBWP vs. USD - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBWP has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than USD's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

KBWP vs. USD - Dividend Comparison

KBWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, more than USD's 0.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KBWP
Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF
2.02%1.58%1.64%1.68%1.99%3.02%1.93%1.99%2.11%1.90%2.14%1.35%
USD
ProShares Ultra Semiconductors
0.21%0.39%0.10%0.05%0.30%0.00%0.14%0.72%0.93%0.32%0.46%0.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


KBWP and USD have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USD has higher volatility (20.29%) compared to KBWP (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBWP dropped -39.76% vs USD's -88.63%.

On 10-year performance, USD leads with 62.35% vs 11.32% for KBWP. On fees, KBWP is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, KBWP has been the lower-risk option at 4.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, USD has performed better with a 62.35% return vs 11.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KBWP is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for USD.

KBWP has the higher dividend yield at 2.02%, compared with 0.21% for USD.

KBWP is categorized as Financials Equities, while USD is Leveraged Equities. KBWP tracks KBW Nasdaq Property & Casualty (TR), while USD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for KBWP and 0.95% for USD.

USD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.94 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KBWP and USD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer