KBWP vs. TRUF
KBWP (Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF) and TRUF (VanEck Financials TruSector ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KBWP charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for TRUF.
Performance
KBWP vs. TRUF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
KBWP
- 1D
- 1.89%
- 1M
- 11.00%
- 6M
- 9.15%
- YTD
- 7.17%
- 1Y
- 16.77%
- 3Y*
- 21.34%
- 5Y*
- 14.45%
- 10Y*
- 12.86%
TRUF
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 5.40%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KBWP vs. TRUF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
KBWP Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF | 14.53% |
TRUF VanEck Financials TruSector ETF | 14.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between KBWP and TRUF is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KBWP vs. TRUF — Risk / Return Rank
KBWP
TRUF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KBWP vs. TRUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) and VanEck Financials TruSector ETF (TRUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KBWP | TRUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.01 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KBWP vs. TRUF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KBWP drawdown since its inception was -39.76%, which is greater than TRUF's maximum drawdown of -3.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBWP and TRUF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KBWP | TRUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.76% | -3.24% | -36.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.00% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.15% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.36% | -1.12% | -3.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.19% | — | — |
Volatility
KBWP vs. TRUF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KBWP | TRUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.38% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.09% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.08% | 13.94% | +3.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.60% | 13.94% | +4.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.76% | 13.94% | +6.82% |
KBWP vs. TRUF - Expense Ratio Comparison
KBWP has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUF's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
KBWP vs. TRUF - Dividend Comparison
KBWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, more than TRUF's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KBWP Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF | 1.83% | 1.58% | 1.64% | 1.68% | 1.99% | 3.02% | 1.93% | 1.99% | 2.11% | 1.90% | 2.14% | 1.35% |
TRUF VanEck Financials TruSector ETF | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KBWP and TRUF have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for KBWP.
KBWP has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 0.36% for TRUF.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for KBWP and 0.10% for TRUF.
Find the right allocation for KBWP and TRUF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer