PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KBWP vs. LVHI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KBWP vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBWP achieves a -3.45% return, which is significantly lower than LVHI's 13.78% return.


KBWP

1D
0.54%
1M
3.51%
YTD
-3.45%
6M
-2.31%
1Y
1.98%
3Y*
16.13%
5Y*
11.67%
10Y*
12.09%

LVHI

1D
0.49%
1M
0.84%
YTD
13.78%
6M
14.96%
1Y
32.13%
3Y*
21.52%
5Y*
15.97%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBWP vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KBWP
Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF
-3.45%11.49%30.45%7.09%10.16%20.61%-2.05%28.67%-2.76%8.86%
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
13.78%27.12%14.81%17.45%3.84%18.19%-8.76%18.35%-5.22%12.26%

Correlation

The correlation between KBWP and LVHI is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2016

0.43

Over the past year, the correlation between KBWP and LVHI has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

KBWP vs. LVHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KBWP
LVHI

Financial Services

100.0%
24.1%

Basic Materials

-

6.8%

Communication Services

-

5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

5.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

8.6%

Energy

-

16.6%

Healthcare

-

7.4%

Industrials

-

13.4%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Technology

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

10.0%

Financial Services

KBWP
100.0%
LVHI
24.1%

Basic Materials

KBWP

-

LVHI
6.8%

Communication Services

KBWP

-

LVHI
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

KBWP

-

LVHI
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

KBWP

-

LVHI
8.6%

Energy

KBWP

-

LVHI
16.6%

Healthcare

KBWP

-

LVHI
7.4%

Industrials

KBWP

-

LVHI
13.4%

Real Estate

KBWP

-

LVHI
1.8%

Technology

KBWP

-

LVHI
0.1%

Utilities

KBWP

-

LVHI
10.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KBWP vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBWP
KBWP Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
KBWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBWP Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
KBWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBWP Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

LVHI
LVHI Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
LVHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHI Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHI Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBWP vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KBWPLVHIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.63

-0.60

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.11

5.23

-5.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.24

21.61

-21.37

KBWP vs. LVHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBWP Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is lower than the LVHI Sharpe Ratio of 3.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBWP and LVHI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KBWP vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBWP drawdown since its inception was -39.76%, which is greater than LVHI's maximum drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBWP and LVHI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KBWPLVHIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.76%

-32.31%

-7.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.56%

-6.08%

-3.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.29%

-11.99%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.00%

-11.99%

-5.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.25%

0.00%

-4.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.37%

-3.51%

-0.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.31%

1.48%

+2.83%

Volatility

KBWP vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison

Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) has a higher volatility of 5.73% compared to Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) at 2.78%. This indicates that KBWP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KBWPLVHIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.73%

2.78%

+2.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.10%

7.72%

+4.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.50%

9.60%

+6.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.60%

11.08%

+7.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.73%

13.75%

+6.98%

KBWP vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBWP has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than LVHI's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

KBWP vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison

KBWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, less than LVHI's 4.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KBWP
Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF
1.92%1.58%1.64%1.68%1.99%3.02%1.93%1.99%2.11%1.90%2.14%1.35%
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
4.69%4.92%3.98%8.12%7.74%4.13%3.97%6.67%10.67%3.38%2.02%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KBWP and LVHI have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KBWP has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to LVHI (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBWP dropped -39.76% vs LVHI's -32.31%.

On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 15.97% vs 11.67% for KBWP. On fees, KBWP is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 15.97% return vs 11.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KBWP is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LVHI.

LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 1.92% for KBWP.

KBWP is categorized as Financials Equities, while LVHI is Volatility Hedged Equity. KBWP tracks KBW Nasdaq Property & Casualty (TR), while LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for KBWP and 0.40% for LVHI.

LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.31 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KBWP and LVHI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer