PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KBUF vs. XLRI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KBUF vs. XLRI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBUF achieves a -9.39% return, which is significantly lower than XLRI's 7.92% return.


KBUF

1D
0.45%
1M
6.29%
6M
-11.08%
YTD
-9.39%
1Y
-3.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.02%

XLRI

1D
-0.49%
1M
0.85%
6M
6.33%
YTD
7.92%
1Y
10.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$6.79K$35.72K$167.86K
$67.65K$68.45K$64.14K

KBUF vs. XLRI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between KBUF and XLRI is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KBUF vs. XLRI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KBUF
KBUF Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
KBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
KBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

XLRI
XLRI Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
XLRI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLRI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLRI Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
XLRI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLRI Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KBUF vs. XLRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KBUFXLRIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.17

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.17

1.42

-1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.33

4.95

-5.29

KBUF vs. XLRI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBUF Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is lower than the XLRI Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBUF and XLRI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KBUF vs. XLRI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBUF drawdown since its inception was -21.14%, which is greater than XLRI's maximum drawdown of -7.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBUF and XLRI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KBUFXLRIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.14%

-7.12%

-14.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.14%

-7.12%

-14.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.74%

-1.11%

-13.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.07%

-1.54%

-3.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.46%

2.03%

+8.43%

Volatility

KBUF vs. XLRI - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI) have volatilities of 3.46% and 3.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KBUFXLRIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

3.34%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.53%

8.74%

+1.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.44%

11.02%

+2.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.18%

11.10%

+3.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.18%

11.10%

+3.08%

KBUF vs. XLRI - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBUF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XLRI's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

KBUF vs. XLRI - Dividend Comparison

KBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.29%, less than XLRI's 14.37% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


KBUF and XLRI have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KBUF has higher volatility (3.46%) compared to XLRI (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBUF dropped -21.14% vs XLRI's -7.12%.

On 1-year performance, XLRI leads with 10.04% vs -3.49% for KBUF. On fees, XLRI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XLRI has been the lower-risk option at 3.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XLRI has performed better with a 10.04% return vs -3.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLRI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for KBUF.

XLRI has the higher dividend yield at 14.37%, compared with 8.29% for KBUF.

KBUF is categorized as Options Trading, while XLRI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for KBUF and 0.35% for XLRI.

XLRI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KBUF and XLRI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer