KBUF vs. XLRI
KBUF (KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF) and XLRI (State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KBUF is a Options Trading fund actively managed by KraneShares, while XLRI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street. Both are actively managed. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KBUF charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLRI.
Performance
KBUF vs. XLRI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KBUF achieves a -15.02% return, which is significantly lower than XLRI's 6.71% return.
KBUF
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -4.18%
- YTD
- -15.02%
- 6M
- -15.46%
- 1Y
- -8.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLRI
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- YTD
- 6.71%
- 6M
- 7.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KBUF vs. XLRI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KBUF KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF | -15.02% | 5.46% |
XLRI State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 6.71% | -0.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between KBUF and XLRI is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KBUF vs. XLRI — Risk / Return Rank
KBUF
XLRI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KBUF vs. XLRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KBUF | XLRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.97 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KBUF vs. XLRI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KBUF drawdown since its inception was -20.04%, which is greater than XLRI's maximum drawdown of -7.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBUF and XLRI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KBUF | XLRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.04% | -7.12% | -12.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.04% | -0.54% | -19.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.46% | -1.65% | -2.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.58% | — | — |
Volatility
KBUF vs. XLRI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KBUF | XLRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.13% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.68% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.13% | 10.99% | +2.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.27% | 10.99% | +3.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.27% | 10.99% | +3.28% |
KBUF vs. XLRI - Expense Ratio Comparison
KBUF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XLRI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
KBUF vs. XLRI - Dividend Comparison
KBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.84%, less than XLRI's 12.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
KBUF KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF | 8.84% | 7.51% | 3.53% |
XLRI State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 12.24% | 6.85% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KBUF and XLRI have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLRI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLRI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for KBUF.
XLRI has the higher dividend yield at 12.24%, compared with 8.84% for KBUF.
KBUF is categorized as Options Trading, while XLRI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for KBUF and 0.35% for XLRI.
Find the right allocation for KBUF and XLRI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer