PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KBUF vs. OCTQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KBUF vs. OCTQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October (OCTQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


KBUF

1D
-2.36%
1M
-3.27%
YTD
-11.47%
6M
-11.63%
1Y
-3.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OCTQ

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBUF vs. OCTQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


KBUF vs. OCTQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KBUF
OCTQ

Communication Services

40.1%
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

38.4%
10.6%

Healthcare

6.9%
8.8%

Real Estate

4.8%
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
5.2%

Technology

3.6%
35.3%

Financial Services

2.0%
13.4%

Basic Materials

-

1.6%

Energy

-

3.0%

Industrials

-

7.8%

Utilities

-

2.5%

Communication Services

KBUF
40.1%
OCTQ
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

KBUF
38.4%
OCTQ
10.6%

Healthcare

KBUF
6.9%
OCTQ
8.8%

Real Estate

KBUF
4.8%
OCTQ
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

KBUF
4.3%
OCTQ
5.2%

Technology

KBUF
3.6%
OCTQ
35.3%

Financial Services

KBUF
2.0%
OCTQ
13.4%

Basic Materials

KBUF

-

OCTQ
1.6%

Energy

KBUF

-

OCTQ
3.0%

Industrials

KBUF

-

OCTQ
7.8%

Utilities

KBUF

-

OCTQ
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KBUF vs. OCTQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBUF
KBUF Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
KBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
KBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

OCTQ
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBUF vs. OCTQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October (OCTQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KBUFOCTQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.42

KBUF vs. OCTQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KBUFOCTQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

Drawdowns

KBUF vs. OCTQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBUF drawdown since its inception was -17.01%, which is greater than OCTQ's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBUF and OCTQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KBUFOCTQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.01%

0.00%

-17.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.70%

0.00%

-16.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.16%

0.00%

-4.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.50%

Volatility

KBUF vs. OCTQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KBUFOCTQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.10%

0.00%

+13.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.35%

0.00%

+14.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.35%

0.00%

+14.35%

KBUF vs. OCTQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBUF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than OCTQ's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

KBUF vs. OCTQ - Dividend Comparison

KBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.49%, while OCTQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, OCTQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

OCTQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for KBUF.

KBUF has the higher dividend yield at 8.49%, compared with 0.00% for OCTQ.

They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for KBUF and 0.79% for OCTQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KBUF and OCTQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer