KBUF vs. KTEC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

KBUF (KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF) and KTEC (KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KBUF is a Options Trading fund actively managed by KraneShares, while KTEC is a China Equities fund tracking the Hang Seng Tech Index. KBUF is actively managed, while KTEC is passively managed. Over the past year, KBUF returned -3.13% vs -8.17% for KTEC. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. KBUF charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for KTEC.

Performance

KBUF vs. KTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) and KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with KBUF having a -11.47% return and KTEC slightly higher at -11.17%.

KBUF

• 1D: -2.36%
• 1M: -3.27%
• YTD: -11.47%
• 6M: -11.63%
• 1Y: -3.13%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KTEC

• 1D: -3.20%
• 1M: -0.29%
• YTD: -11.17%
• 6M: -12.80%
• 1Y: -8.17%
• 3Y*: 7.14%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBUF vs. KTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
KBUF KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF	-11.47%	18.04%	16.58%
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF	-11.17%	21.01%	39.07%

Correlation

The correlation between KBUF and KTEC is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2024	0.88

The correlation between KBUF and KTEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

KBUF vs. KTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KBUF	KTEC
Communication Services	40.1%	27.6%
Consumer Cyclical	38.4%	48.6%
Healthcare	6.9%	2.5%
Real Estate	4.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.3%	-
Technology	3.6%	21.3%
Financial Services	2.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Energy	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

KBUF vs. KTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBUF

KBUF Risk / Return Rank: 6
KBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
KBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
KBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 6
KBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
KBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 7

KTEC

KTEC Risk / Return Rank: 6
KTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
KTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
KTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 6
KTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
KTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBUF vs. KTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) and KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KBUF	KTEC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.24	-0.29	+0.05
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.25	-0.24	-0.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	0.97	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.18	-0.28	+0.09
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.42	-0.50	+0.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KBUF vs. KTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBUF Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is comparable to the KTEC Sharpe Ratio of -0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBUF and KTEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KBUF	KTEC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.24	-0.29	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	-0.24	+0.86

Drawdowns

KBUF vs. KTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBUF drawdown since its inception was -17.01%, smaller than the maximum KTEC drawdown of -66.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBUF and KTEC.

Drawdown Indicators

	KBUF	KTEC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.01%	-66.90%	+49.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.01%	-29.36%	+12.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-34.71%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.70%	-43.95%	+27.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.16%	-43.97%	+39.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.50%	16.26%	-8.76%

Volatility

KBUF vs. KTEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) is 6.22%, while KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) has a volatility of 10.62%. This indicates that KBUF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KBUF	KTEC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.22%	10.62%	-4.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.53%	20.56%	-10.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.10%	28.01%	-14.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.35%	43.22%	-28.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.35%	43.22%	-28.87%

KBUF vs. KTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBUF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than KTEC's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

KBUF vs. KTEC - Dividend Comparison

KBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.49%, more than KTEC's 3.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
KBUF KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF	8.49%	7.51%	3.53%	0.00%	0.00%
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF	3.78%	3.36%	0.27%	0.81%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KBUF and KTEC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, KBUF and KTEC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, KBUF or KTEC?

KTEC has higher volatility (10.62%) compared to KBUF (6.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBUF dropped -17.01% vs KTEC's -66.90%.

Which ETF is better, KBUF or KTEC?

On 1-year performance, KBUF leads with -3.13% vs -8.17% for KTEC. On fees, KTEC is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, KBUF has been the lower-risk option at 6.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KBUF or KTEC?

Over the 1-year period, KBUF has performed better with a -3.13% return vs -8.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KBUF or KTEC?

KTEC is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for KBUF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KBUF or KTEC?

KBUF has the higher dividend yield at 8.49%, compared with 3.78% for KTEC.

What is the main difference between KBUF and KTEC?

KBUF is categorized as Options Trading, while KTEC is China Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for KBUF and 0.69% for KTEC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KBUF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.24 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.