KBUF vs. IWMY
KBUF (KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF) and IWMY (Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, KBUF returned -3.49% vs 21.52% for IWMY. Their 0.33 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. KBUF charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for IWMY.
Performance
KBUF vs. IWMY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KBUF achieves a -9.39% return, which is significantly lower than IWMY's 15.27% return.
KBUF
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 6.29%
- 6M
- -11.08%
- YTD
- -9.39%
- 1Y
- -3.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.02%
IWMY
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- -0.31%
- 6M
- 10.17%
- YTD
- 15.27%
- 1Y
- 21.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.16%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $647.71K | $735.48K | $1.03M | |
| $6.79K | $35.72K | $167.86K |
KBUF vs. IWMY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
KBUF KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF | -9.39% | 18.04% | 15.85% |
IWMY Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF | 15.27% | 10.18% | 7.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between KBUF and IWMY is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2024 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KBUF vs. IWMY — Risk / Return Rank
KBUF
IWMY
KBUF vs. IWMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) and Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF (IWMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KBUF | IWMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.23 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.17 | 1.87 | -2.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.33 | 6.07 | -6.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KBUF vs. IWMY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KBUF drawdown since its inception was -21.14%, which is greater than IWMY's maximum drawdown of -18.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBUF and IWMY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KBUF | IWMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.14% | -18.72% | -2.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.14% | -11.57% | -9.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.74% | -0.99% | -13.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.07% | -2.88% | -2.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.46% | 3.56% | +6.90% |
Volatility
KBUF vs. IWMY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) is 3.46%, while Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF (IWMY) has a volatility of 3.81%. This indicates that KBUF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KBUF | IWMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.46% | 3.81% | -0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.53% | 13.49% | -2.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.44% | 16.34% | -2.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.18% | 15.80% | -1.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.18% | 15.80% | -1.62% |
KBUF vs. IWMY - Expense Ratio Comparison
KBUF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than IWMY's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
KBUF vs. IWMY - Dividend Comparison
KBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.29%, less than IWMY's 41.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IWMY Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF | 41.16% | 63.33% | 107.92% | 11.34% |
KBUF KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF | 8.29% | 7.51% | 3.53% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KBUF and IWMY have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWMY has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to KBUF (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBUF dropped -21.14% vs IWMY's -18.72%.
On 1-year performance, IWMY leads with 21.52% vs -3.49% for KBUF. On fees, KBUF is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, KBUF has been the lower-risk option at 3.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IWMY has performed better with a 21.52% return vs -3.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KBUF is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for IWMY.
IWMY has the higher dividend yield at 41.16%, compared with 8.29% for KBUF.
They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for KBUF and 1.05% for IWMY.
IWMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KBUF and IWMY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer