PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KBUF vs. DMAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

KBUF vs. DMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

KBUF vs. DMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBUF achieves a -8.35% return, which is significantly lower than DMAR's 2.10% return.


KBUF

1D
-0.32%
1M
-3.89%
YTD
-8.35%
6M
-13.25%
1Y
-0.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DMAR

1D
0.30%
1M
1.00%
YTD
2.10%
6M
4.31%
1Y
12.72%
3Y*
11.26%
5Y*
7.12%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KBUF vs. DMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBUF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DMAR's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

KBUF vs. DMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBUF
KBUF Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
KBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
KBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

DMAR
DMAR Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
DMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
DMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBUF vs. DMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KBUFDMARDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.02

1.68

-1.71

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.06

2.48

-2.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.52

-0.51

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.00

2.09

-2.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.01

13.80

-13.81

KBUF vs. DMAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBUF Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the DMAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBUF and DMAR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KBUFDMARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

1.68

-1.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

1.04

-0.22

Correlation

The correlation between KBUF and DMAR is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

KBUF vs. DMAR - Dividend Comparison

KBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.20%, while DMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

KBUF vs. DMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBUF drawdown since its inception was -14.55%, which is greater than DMAR's maximum drawdown of -9.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBUF and DMAR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


KBUFDMARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.55%

-9.84%

-4.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.55%

-6.15%

-8.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.76%

0.00%

-13.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.39%

-1.91%

-1.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.92%

0.93%

+3.99%

Volatility

KBUF vs. DMAR - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) has a higher volatility of 4.42% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR) at 1.94%. This indicates that KBUF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


KBUFDMARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.42%

1.94%

+2.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.20%

2.72%

+6.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.87%

7.59%

+5.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.07%

7.06%

+7.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.07%

7.04%

+7.03%