KBR vs. LIT

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

KBR (KBR, Inc.) is a stock, while LIT (Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF) is Lithium & Battery Metals fund tracking the Solactive Global Lithium Index. Over the past 10 years, KBR returned 11.28%/yr vs 14.29%/yr for LIT. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

KBR vs. LIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KBR, Inc. (KBR) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBR achieves a -16.68% return, which is significantly lower than LIT's 21.66% return. Over the past 10 years, KBR has underperformed LIT with an annualized return of 11.28%, while LIT has yielded a comparatively higher 14.29% annualized return.

KBR

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: -0.35%
• YTD: -16.68%
• 6M: -16.74%
• 1Y: -29.46%
• 3Y*: -18.06%
• 5Y*: -1.84%
• 10Y*: 11.28%

LIT

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: -7.47%
• YTD: 21.66%
• 6M: 17.92%
• 1Y: 107.76%
• 3Y*: 9.04%
• 5Y*: 2.91%
• 10Y*: 14.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBR vs. LIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
KBR KBR, Inc.	-16.68%	-29.66%	5.58%	5.94%	11.93%	55.64%	3.23%	103.61%	-22.05%	21.16%
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF	21.66%	60.05%	-19.19%	-12.18%	-29.91%	36.74%	127.88%	3.27%	-28.63%	64.19%

Correlation

The correlation between KBR and LIT is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2010	0.42

Over the past year, the correlation between KBR and LIT has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

KBR vs. LIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBR

KBR Risk / Return Rank: 10
KBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
KBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
KBR Omega Ratio Rank: 10
KBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
KBR Martin Ratio Rank: 8

LIT

LIT Risk / Return Rank: 91
LIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
LIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
LIT Omega Ratio Rank: 86
LIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
LIT Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBR vs. LIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KBR, Inc. (KBR) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KBR	LIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.93	3.18	-4.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.29	3.59	-4.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	1.47	-0.62
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.72	6.58	-7.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.46	22.58	-24.03

KBR vs. LIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBR Sharpe Ratio is -0.93, which is lower than the LIT Sharpe Ratio of 3.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBR and LIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KBR vs. LIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBR drawdown since its inception was -77.47%, which is greater than LIT's maximum drawdown of -65.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBR and LIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	KBR	LIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.47%	-65.91%	-11.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.07%	-16.46%	-24.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-57.39%	-53.01%	-4.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.39%	-65.91%	+8.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.94%	-65.91%	+7.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-52.74%	-14.94%	-37.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.98%	-33.55%	-0.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.26%	4.79%	+15.47%

Volatility

KBR vs. LIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KBR, Inc. (KBR) is 10.11%, while Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) has a volatility of 11.71%. This indicates that KBR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KBR	LIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.11%	11.71%	-1.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.19%	24.39%	+0.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.64%	34.27%	-2.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.73%	32.09%	-3.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.77%	30.74%	+6.03%

Dividends

KBR vs. LIT - Dividend Comparison

KBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than LIT's 0.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KBR KBR, Inc.	1.99%	1.64%	1.04%	0.97%	0.91%	0.92%	1.29%	1.05%	2.11%	1.61%	1.92%	1.89%
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF	0.40%	0.49%	0.93%	1.11%	0.99%	0.22%	0.40%	1.85%	2.52%	3.26%	2.15%	0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KBR and LIT in my portfolio?

KBR and LIT have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KBR or LIT?

LIT has higher volatility (11.71%) compared to KBR (10.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBR dropped -77.47% vs LIT's -65.91%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.