KBR vs. LIT
KBR (KBR, Inc.) is a stock, while LIT (Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF) is Lithium & Battery Metals fund tracking the Solactive Global Lithium Index. Over the past 10 years, KBR returned 10.54%/yr vs 12.82%/yr for LIT. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
KBR vs. LIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KBR achieves a -8.80% return, which is significantly lower than LIT's 12.49% return. Over the past 10 years, KBR has underperformed LIT with an annualized return of 10.54%, while LIT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.82% annualized return.
KBR
- 1D
- -3.97%
- 1M
- -2.94%
- 6M
- -14.02%
- YTD
- -8.80%
- 1Y
- -25.63%
- 3Y*
- -15.04%
- 5Y*
- 0.16%
- 10Y*
- 10.54%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.06%
LIT
- 1D
- 1.34%
- 1M
- -4.62%
- 6M
- 3.07%
- YTD
- 12.49%
- 1Y
- 73.37%
- 3Y*
- 5.48%
- 5Y*
- -2.61%
- 10Y*
- 12.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.67%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
KBR KBR, Inc. | $76.99M | $62.20M | $65.66M |
| $15.84M | $16.64M | $32.68M |
KBR vs. LIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KBR KBR, Inc. | -8.80% | -29.66% | 5.58% | 5.94% | 11.93% | 55.64% | 3.23% | 103.61% | -22.05% | 21.16% |
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF | 12.49% | 60.05% | -19.19% | -12.18% | -29.91% | 36.74% | 127.88% | 3.27% | -28.63% | 64.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between KBR and LIT is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2010 | 0.41 |
Over the past year, the correlation between KBR and LIT has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KBR vs. LIT — Risk / Return Rank
KBR
LIT
KBR vs. LIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KBR, Inc. (KBR) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KBR | LIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.34 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | 2.75 | -3.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.14 | 8.43 | -9.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KBR vs. LIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KBR drawdown since its inception was -77.47%, which is greater than LIT's maximum drawdown of -65.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBR and LIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KBR | LIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.47% | -65.91% | -11.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.07% | -26.84% | -14.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.39% | -48.65% | -8.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.39% | -65.91% | +8.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.94% | -65.91% | +7.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.27% | -21.35% | -26.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.06% | -33.47% | -0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.60% | 8.74% | +13.86% |
Volatility
KBR vs. LIT - Volatility Comparison
KBR, Inc. (KBR) has a higher volatility of 12.04% compared to Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) at 9.63%. This indicates that KBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KBR | LIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.04% | 9.63% | +2.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.34% | 24.74% | +2.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.71% | 34.49% | -0.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.31% | 31.91% | -2.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.69% | 30.82% | +5.87% |
Dividends
KBR vs. LIT - Dividend Comparison
KBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, more than LIT's 0.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KBR KBR, Inc. | 1.82% | 1.64% | 1.04% | 0.97% | 0.91% | 0.92% | 1.29% | 1.05% | 2.11% | 1.61% | 1.92% | 1.89% |
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF | 0.69% | 0.49% | 0.93% | 1.11% | 0.99% | 0.22% | 0.40% | 1.85% | 2.52% | 3.26% | 2.15% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KBR and LIT have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KBR has higher volatility (12.04%) compared to LIT (9.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBR dropped -77.47% vs LIT's -65.91%.
LIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KBR and LIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer