PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KBE vs. XLK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KBE vs. XLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Bank ETF (KBE) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBE achieves a 2.87% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 36.47% return. Over the past 10 years, KBE has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 9.19%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 25.84% annualized return.


KBE

1D
-2.28%
1M
-1.94%
YTD
2.87%
6M
4.27%
1Y
18.75%
3Y*
22.67%
5Y*
5.28%
10Y*
9.19%

XLK

1D
-1.00%
1M
21.09%
YTD
36.47%
6M
35.71%
1Y
66.93%
3Y*
33.90%
5Y*
23.83%
10Y*
25.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBE vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KBE
SPDR S&P Bank ETF
2.87%12.36%23.78%5.30%-14.83%33.46%-8.75%29.78%-19.65%10.49%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
36.47%24.61%21.63%56.02%-27.73%34.74%43.62%49.86%-1.68%34.26%

Correlation

The correlation between KBE and XLK is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2005

0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between KBE and XLK has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

KBE vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KBE
XLK

Financial Services

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

0.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

99.7%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

KBE
100.0%
XLK

-

Basic Materials

KBE

-

XLK

-

Communication Services

KBE

-

XLK

-

Consumer Cyclical

KBE

-

XLK

-

Consumer Defensive

KBE

-

XLK

-

Energy

KBE

-

XLK
0.2%

Healthcare

KBE

-

XLK

-

Industrials

KBE

-

XLK
0.1%

Real Estate

KBE

-

XLK

-

Technology

KBE

-

XLK
99.7%

Utilities

KBE

-

XLK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KBE vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBE
KBE Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
KBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBE Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
KBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBE Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

XLK
XLK Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBE vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Bank ETF (KBE) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KBEXLKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.52

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

4.22

-2.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.39

14.16

-10.77

KBE vs. XLK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBE Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the XLK Sharpe Ratio of 3.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBE and XLK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KBEXLKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

3.24

-2.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.96

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

1.06

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.42

-0.32

Drawdowns

KBE vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBE drawdown since its inception was -83.15%, roughly equal to the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBE and XLK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KBEXLKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.15%

-82.05%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.63%

-15.92%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.97%

-25.66%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.25%

-33.56%

-11.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.14%

-33.56%

-19.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.38%

-1.00%

-6.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.54%

-34.96%

+7.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.55%

4.74%

+0.81%

Volatility

KBE vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Bank ETF (KBE) is 5.65%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 6.98%. This indicates that KBE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KBEXLKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.65%

6.98%

-1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.93%

16.68%

-1.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.62%

20.82%

+0.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.36%

24.90%

+2.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.85%

24.49%

+5.36%

KBE vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

KBE vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison

KBE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, more than XLK's 0.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KBE
SPDR S&P Bank ETF
2.39%2.51%2.35%2.78%2.99%2.16%2.44%2.33%2.18%1.36%1.39%1.70%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
0.39%0.54%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


KBE and XLK have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLK has higher volatility (6.98%) compared to KBE (5.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBE dropped -83.15% vs XLK's -82.05%.

On 10-year performance, XLK leads with 25.84% vs 9.19% for KBE. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, KBE has been the lower-risk option at 5.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLK has performed better with a 25.84% return vs 9.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for KBE.

KBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.39%, compared with 0.39% for XLK.

KBE is categorized as Financials Equities, while XLK is Technology Equities. KBE tracks S&P Banks Select Industry Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for KBE and 0.08% for XLK.

XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KBE and XLK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer