KBDU vs. KSTR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

KBDU (KraneShares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF) and KSTR (KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KBDU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by KraneShares, while KSTR is a China Equities fund tracking the SSE Science and Technology Innovation Board 50 Index. KBDU is actively managed, while KSTR is passively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KBDU charges 1.26%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for KSTR.

Performance

KBDU vs. KSTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF (KBDU) and KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBDU achieves a -11.68% return, which is significantly lower than KSTR's 32.94% return.

KBDU

• 1D: -5.85%
• 1M: 3.94%
• YTD: -11.68%
• 6M: 6.79%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KSTR

• 1D: 1.39%
• 1M: 7.01%
• YTD: 32.94%
• 6M: 38.23%
• 1Y: 83.76%
• 3Y*: 16.36%
• 5Y*: -0.21%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBDU vs. KSTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KBDU KraneShares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF	-11.68%	34.59%
KSTR KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF	32.94%	5.14%

Correlation

The correlation between KBDU and KSTR is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025	0.48

Return for Risk

KBDU vs. KSTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KSTR

KSTR Risk / Return Rank: 71
KSTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
KSTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
KSTR Omega Ratio Rank: 65
KSTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
KSTR Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBDU vs. KSTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF (KBDU) and KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KBDU	KSTR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.01	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	-0.00	+0.38

Drawdowns

KBDU vs. KSTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBDU drawdown since its inception was -59.14%, smaller than the maximum KSTR drawdown of -66.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBDU and KSTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	KBDU	KSTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.14%	-66.46%	+7.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.70%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-41.55%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-66.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-40.93%	-10.98%	-29.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.72%	-38.77%	+10.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	6.97%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KBDU	KSTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	15.14%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	26.21%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	102.15%	35.48%	+66.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	102.15%	38.31%	+63.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	102.15%	37.68%	+64.47%

KBDU vs. KSTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBDU has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than KSTR's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

KBDU vs. KSTR - Dividend Comparison

Neither KBDU nor KSTR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KBDU and KSTR in my portfolio?

KBDU and KSTR have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, KBDU or KSTR?

On fees, KSTR is cheaper at 0.89% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, KBDU or KSTR?

KSTR is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 1.26% for KBDU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KBDU or KSTR?

KBDU and KSTR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between KBDU and KSTR?

KBDU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while KSTR is China Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.26% for KBDU and 0.89% for KSTR.