KAT vs. UGA

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

KAT (Scharf ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund, LP) are both exchange-traded funds - KAT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Scharf Investments, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Near-Month NYMEX RBOB Gasoline Futures Contract. KAT is actively managed, while UGA is passively managed. Their -0.23 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. KAT charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for UGA.

Performance

KAT vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Scharf ETF (KAT) and United States Gasoline Fund, LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KAT achieves a 5.56% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 72.77% return.

KAT

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 4.35%
• 6M: 3.91%
• YTD: 5.56%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

UGA

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 0.07%
• 6M: 54.03%
• YTD: 72.77%
• 1Y: 71.49%
• 3Y*: 14.87%
• 5Y*: 24.07%
• 10Y*: 16.28%
• ALL TIME*: 4.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
KAT Scharf ETF	$548.42K	$612.02K	$692.64K
UGA United States Gasoline Fund, LP	$8.67M	$6.11M	$4.99M

KAT vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KAT Scharf ETF	5.56%	0.85%
UGA United States Gasoline Fund, LP	72.77%	-4.26%

Correlation

The correlation between KAT and UGA is -0.23, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2025	-0.23

Return for Risk

KAT vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KAT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

UGA

UGA Risk / Return Rank: 72
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 67
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KAT vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Scharf ETF (KAT) and United States Gasoline Fund, LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KAT	UGA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.96	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.47	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.32	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.54	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.75	—

Drawdowns

KAT vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KAT drawdown since its inception was -9.25%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KAT and UGA.

Drawdown Indicators

	KAT	UGA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.25%	-86.59%	+77.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-20.32%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.68%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.11%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.07%	-14.67%	+14.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.42%	-36.52%	+33.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	7.36%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KAT	UGA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	13.00%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	32.16%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.48%	36.60%	-26.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.48%	34.71%	-24.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.48%	37.31%	-26.83%

KAT vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

KAT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 1.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

KAT vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

KAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM
KAT Scharf ETF	0.08%
UGA United States Gasoline Fund, LP	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KAT and UGA in my portfolio?

KAT and UGA have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, KAT or UGA?

On fees, KAT is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, KAT or UGA?

KAT is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for UGA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KAT or UGA?

KAT has the higher dividend yield at 0.08%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.

What is the main difference between KAT and UGA?

KAT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while UGA is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Scharf Investments and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for KAT and 1.02% for UGA.