KAT vs. FNDX
KAT (Scharf ETF) and FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KAT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Scharf Investments, while FNDX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. KAT is actively managed, while FNDX is passively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KAT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDX.
Performance
KAT vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KAT achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 14.57% return.
KAT
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 0.37%
- 6M
- 2.21%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNDX
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 3.88%
- YTD
- 14.57%
- 6M
- 14.58%
- 1Y
- 32.32%
- 3Y*
- 20.90%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- 14.26%
KAT vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KAT Scharf ETF | 0.37% | 0.98% |
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 14.57% | 7.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between KAT and FNDX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2025 | 0.71 |
KAT vs. FNDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KAT
FNDX
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Technology
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
KAT
FNDX
Healthcare
KAT
FNDX
Industrials
KAT
FNDX
Technology
KAT
FNDX
Communication Services
KAT
FNDX
Energy
KAT
FNDX
Consumer Cyclical
KAT
FNDX
Basic Materials
KAT
FNDX
Consumer Defensive
KAT
FNDX
Real Estate
KAT
-
FNDX
Utilities
KAT
-
FNDX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KAT vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank
KAT
FNDX
KAT vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Scharf ETF (KAT) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KAT | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.79 | -0.63 |
Drawdowns
KAT vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KAT drawdown since its inception was -9.25%, smaller than the maximum FNDX drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KAT and FNDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KAT | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.25% | -37.72% | +28.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.98% | -0.13% | -4.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.20% | -3.55% | +0.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.55% | — |
Volatility
KAT vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KAT | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.25% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.25% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.48% | 10.22% | +0.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.48% | 15.18% | -4.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.48% | 17.50% | -7.02% |
KAT vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
KAT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
KAT vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison
KAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 1.45% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 1.82% | 2.07% | 1.64% | 2.29% | 2.23% | 2.40% | 1.86% | 2.01% | 2.01% |
KAT Scharf ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KAT and FNDX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FNDX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FNDX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for KAT.
FNDX has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.00% for KAT.
KAT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FNDX is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Scharf Investments and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for KAT and 0.25% for FNDX.
Find the right allocation for KAT and FNDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer