PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KAT vs. BUFH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KAT vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Scharf ETF (KAT) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KAT achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than BUFH's 2.45% return.


KAT

1D
-0.74%
1M
0.22%
YTD
0.37%
6M
2.21%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUFH

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.75%
YTD
2.45%
6M
2.82%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KAT vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
KAT
Scharf ETF
0.37%0.98%
BUFH
FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF
2.45%2.27%

Correlation

The correlation between KAT and BUFH is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2025

0.52

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KAT vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Scharf ETF (KAT) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

KAT vs. BUFH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KATBUFHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

2.91

-2.74

Drawdowns

KAT vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KAT drawdown since its inception was -9.25%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KAT and BUFH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KATBUFHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.25%

-1.53%

-7.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.98%

-0.05%

-4.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.20%

-0.18%

-3.02%

Volatility

KAT vs. BUFH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KATBUFHDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.48%

2.37%

+8.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.48%

2.37%

+8.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.48%

2.37%

+8.11%

KAT vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison

KAT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

KAT vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison

Neither KAT nor BUFH has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


KAT and BUFH have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, KAT is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

KAT is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.

KAT and BUFH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

KAT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Scharf Investments and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for KAT and 0.95% for BUFH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KAT and BUFH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer