KAT vs. BUFH
KAT (Scharf ETF) and BUFH (FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KAT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Scharf Investments, while BUFH is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KAT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BUFH.
Performance
KAT vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KAT achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than BUFH's 2.45% return.
KAT
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 0.37%
- 6M
- 2.21%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUFH
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- 2.45%
- 6M
- 2.82%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KAT vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KAT Scharf ETF | 0.37% | 0.98% |
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 2.45% | 2.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between KAT and BUFH is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2025 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KAT vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Scharf ETF (KAT) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KAT | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 2.91 | -2.74 |
Drawdowns
KAT vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KAT drawdown since its inception was -9.25%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KAT and BUFH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KAT | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.25% | -1.53% | -7.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.98% | -0.05% | -4.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.20% | -0.18% | -3.02% |
Volatility
KAT vs. BUFH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KAT | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.48% | 2.37% | +8.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.48% | 2.37% | +8.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.48% | 2.37% | +8.11% |
KAT vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison
KAT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
KAT vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison
Neither KAT nor BUFH has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
KAT and BUFH have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KAT is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KAT is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.
KAT and BUFH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
KAT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Scharf Investments and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for KAT and 0.95% for BUFH.
Find the right allocation for KAT and BUFH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer