PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
K vs. LMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

K vs. LMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kellogg Company (K) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


K

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LMT

1D
0.91%
1M
4.08%
YTD
9.57%
6M
17.20%
1Y
11.67%
3Y*
7.37%
5Y*
8.75%
10Y*
11.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

K vs. LMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
K
Kellogg Company
0.00%5.99%49.75%-7.44%14.35%7.44%-6.78%26.08%-13.32%-4.93%
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
9.57%2.47%10.02%-4.31%40.48%3.15%-6.49%52.55%-16.35%31.77%

Correlation

The correlation between K and LMT is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 1984

0.22

Over the past year, the correlation between K and LMT has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.22, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

K:

$29.20B

LMT:

$121.04B

EPS

K:

$3.65

LMT:

$20.61

PE Ratio

K:

22.87

LMT:

25.41

PS Ratio

K:

2.30

LMT:

1.62

PB Ratio

K:

6.95

LMT:

16.16

Total Revenue (TTM)

K:

$12.67B

LMT:

$75.12B

Gross Profit (TTM)

K:

$4.41B

LMT:

$7.37B

EBITDA (TTM)

K:

$2.25B

LMT:

$8.09B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

K vs. LMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

K

LMT
LMT Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
LMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMT Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
LMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMT Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

K vs. LMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kellogg Company (K) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

K vs. LMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KLMTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

Drawdowns

K vs. LMT - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KLMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.41%

Volatility

K vs. LMT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KLMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.71%

Dividends

K vs. LMT - Dividend Comparison

K's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than LMT's 2.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
K
Kellogg Company
1.39%2.76%2.79%10.56%3.28%3.59%3.66%3.27%3.86%3.12%2.77%2.74%
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
2.61%2.76%2.62%2.68%2.34%2.98%2.76%2.31%3.13%2.32%2.71%2.83%

Financials

K vs. LMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kellogg Company and Lockheed Martin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
3.26B
18.02B
(K) Total Revenue
(LMT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

K vs. LMT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kellogg Company and Lockheed Martin Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
33.3%
11.5%
Portfolio components
K - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kellogg Company reported a gross profit of 1.08B and revenue of 3.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.3%.

LMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.08B and revenue of 18.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.5%.

K - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kellogg Company reported an operating income of 452.00M and revenue of 3.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.9%.

LMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported an operating income of 2.06B and revenue of 18.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.

K - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kellogg Company reported a net income of 309.00M and revenue of 3.26B, resulting in a net margin of 9.5%.

LMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a net income of 1.49B and revenue of 18.02B, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


K and LMT have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for K and LMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer