PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
K vs. DUK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

K vs. DUK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kellogg Company (K) and Duke Energy Corporation (DUK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


K

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

DUK

1D
1.62%
1M
3.59%
6M
9.34%
YTD
11.36%
1Y
10.00%
3Y*
14.96%
5Y*
8.30%
10Y*
8.35%
ALL TIME*
10.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$440.71M$478.37M$438.33M

K vs. DUK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
K
Kellogg Company
0.00%5.99%49.75%-7.44%14.35%7.44%-6.78%26.08%-13.32%-4.93%
DUK
Duke Energy Corporation
11.36%12.72%15.56%-1.63%2.03%19.11%4.77%10.29%7.41%12.96%

Correlation

The correlation between K and DUK is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 1984

0.31

Over the past year, the correlation between K and DUK has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

K:

$29.20B

DUK:

$99.75B

EPS

K:

$3.65

DUK:

$6.61

PE Ratio

K:

22.87

DUK:

19.37

PEG Ratio

K:

3.84

DUK:

1.52

PS Ratio

K:

2.30

DUK:

2.99

PB Ratio

K:

6.95

DUK:

1.86

Total Revenue (TTM)

K:

$12.67B

DUK:

$33.29B

Gross Profit (TTM)

K:

$4.41B

DUK:

$19.45B

EBITDA (TTM)

K:

$2.25B

DUK:

$15.91B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

K vs. DUK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

K

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


DUK
DUK Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
DUK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DUK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
DUK Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
DUK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
DUK Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

K vs. DUK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kellogg Company (K) and Duke Energy Corporation (DUK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KDUKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.10

K vs. DUK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

K vs. DUK - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KDUKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.78%

Volatility

K vs. DUK - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KDUKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.45%

Dividends

K vs. DUK - Dividend Comparison

K has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DUK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DUK
Duke Energy Corporation
3.60%3.60%3.84%4.18%3.86%3.72%4.17%4.11%4.21%4.15%4.33%4.54%
K
Kellogg Company
1.39%2.76%2.79%10.56%3.28%3.59%3.66%3.27%3.86%3.12%2.77%2.74%

Financials

K vs. DUK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kellogg Company and Duke Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00BOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
3.26B
9.18B
(K) Total Revenue
(DUK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

K vs. DUK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kellogg Company and Duke Energy Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%October2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
33.3%
67.9%
Portfolio components
K - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kellogg Company reported a gross profit of 1.08B and revenue of 3.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.3%.

DUK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Duke Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 6.23B and revenue of 9.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.9%.

K - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kellogg Company reported an operating income of 452.00M and revenue of 3.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.9%.

DUK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Duke Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 2.73B and revenue of 9.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.7%.

K - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kellogg Company reported a net income of 309.00M and revenue of 3.26B, resulting in a net margin of 9.5%.

DUK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Duke Energy Corporation reported a net income of 1.55B and revenue of 9.18B, resulting in a net margin of 16.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


K and DUK have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for K and DUK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer