K.TO vs. XEF-U.TO
K.TO (Kinross Gold Corporation) is a stock, while XEF-U.TO (iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF) is Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE® Investable Market Index. Over the past 10 years, K.TO returned 18.78%/yr vs 6.91%/yr for XEF-U.TO. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
K.TO vs. XEF-U.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
K.TO is traded in CAD, while XEF-U.TO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XEF-U.TO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, K.TO achieves a -14.21% return, which is significantly lower than XEF-U.TO's 13.01% return. Over the past 10 years, K.TO has outperformed XEF-U.TO with an annualized return of 18.78%, while XEF-U.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 6.91% annualized return.
K.TO
- 1D
- 4.49%
- 1M
- -10.47%
- 6M
- -34.41%
- YTD
- -14.21%
- 1Y
- 52.52%
- 3Y*
- 72.93%
- 5Y*
- 36.30%
- 10Y*
- 18.78%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.15%
XEF-U.TO
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- 6M
- 9.12%
- YTD
- 13.01%
- 1Y
- 23.64%
- 3Y*
- 18.23%
- 5Y*
- 11.11%
- 10Y*
- 6.91%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.44%
K.TO vs. XEF-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K.TO Kinross Gold Corporation | -14.21% | 191.80% | 69.08% | 49.14% | -22.75% | -20.24% | 53.32% | 40.00% | -18.82% | 29.36% |
XEF-U.TO iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF | 13.01% | 25.69% | 11.75% | 13.94% | -9.57% | 11.30% | 7.69% | -15.98% | 0.56% | 9.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between K.TO and XEF-U.TO is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2013 | 0.11 |
Over the past year, K.TO and XEF-U.TO have become more correlated (0.46) than their long-term average of 0.11, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
K.TO vs. XEF-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank
K.TO
XEF-U.TO
K.TO vs. XEF-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| K.TO | XEF-U.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.27 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | 2.11 | -0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.24 | 8.09 | -4.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
K.TO vs. XEF-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum K.TO drawdown since its inception was -92.37%, which is greater than XEF-U.TO's maximum drawdown of -42.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for K.TO and XEF-U.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| K.TO | XEF-U.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.37% | -42.21% | -50.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.86% | -11.34% | -27.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.86% | -14.64% | -24.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.71% | -25.28% | -28.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.25% | -42.21% | -26.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.12% | -2.38% | -33.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.11% | -8.97% | -47.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.25% | 2.94% | +13.31% |
Volatility
K.TO vs. XEF-U.TO - Volatility Comparison
Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.58% compared to iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF-U.TO) at 4.26%. This indicates that K.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XEF-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| K.TO | XEF-U.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.58% | 4.26% | +9.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.35% | 13.44% | +26.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.24% | 15.58% | +36.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.71% | 17.63% | +25.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.47% | 18.13% | +27.34% |
Dividends
K.TO vs. XEF-U.TO - Dividend Comparison
K.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than XEF-U.TO's 2.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K.TO Kinross Gold Corporation | 0.61% | 0.45% | 1.23% | 2.04% | 2.68% | 1.63% | 1.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XEF-U.TO iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF | 2.35% | 2.44% | 2.85% | 2.76% | 2.98% | 2.43% | 1.86% | 2.72% | 2.07% | 1.62% | 1.84% | 1.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
K.TO and XEF-U.TO have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for K.TO and XEF-U.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer