PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
K.TO vs. XEF-U.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

K.TO vs. XEF-U.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF-U.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

K.TO is traded in CAD, while XEF-U.TO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XEF-U.TO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, K.TO achieves a -14.21% return, which is significantly lower than XEF-U.TO's 13.01% return. Over the past 10 years, K.TO has outperformed XEF-U.TO with an annualized return of 18.78%, while XEF-U.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 6.91% annualized return.


K.TO

1D
4.49%
1M
-10.47%
6M
-34.41%
YTD
-14.21%
1Y
52.52%
3Y*
72.93%
5Y*
36.30%
10Y*
18.78%
ALL TIME*
5.15%

XEF-U.TO

1D
1.77%
1M
-0.34%
6M
9.12%
YTD
13.01%
1Y
23.64%
3Y*
18.23%
5Y*
11.11%
10Y*
6.91%
ALL TIME*
9.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

K.TO vs. XEF-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
K.TO
Kinross Gold Corporation
-14.21%191.80%69.08%49.14%-22.75%-20.24%53.32%40.00%-18.82%29.36%
XEF-U.TO
iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF
13.01%25.69%11.75%13.94%-9.57%11.30%7.69%-15.98%0.56%9.18%

Correlation

The correlation between K.TO and XEF-U.TO is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2013

0.11

Over the past year, K.TO and XEF-U.TO have become more correlated (0.46) than their long-term average of 0.11, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

K.TO vs. XEF-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

K.TO
K.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
K.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
K.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
K.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
K.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
K.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

XEF-U.TO
XEF-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
XEF-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEF-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEF-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
XEF-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEF-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

K.TO vs. XEF-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


K.TOXEF-U.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.27

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

2.11

-0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.24

8.09

-4.84

K.TO vs. XEF-U.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current K.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the XEF-U.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of K.TO and XEF-U.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

K.TO vs. XEF-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum K.TO drawdown since its inception was -92.37%, which is greater than XEF-U.TO's maximum drawdown of -42.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for K.TO and XEF-U.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


K.TOXEF-U.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.37%

-42.21%

-50.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.86%

-11.34%

-27.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.86%

-14.64%

-24.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.71%

-25.28%

-28.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.25%

-42.21%

-26.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.12%

-2.38%

-33.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.11%

-8.97%

-47.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.25%

2.94%

+13.31%

Volatility

K.TO vs. XEF-U.TO - Volatility Comparison

Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.58% compared to iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF-U.TO) at 4.26%. This indicates that K.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XEF-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


K.TOXEF-U.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.58%

4.26%

+9.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.35%

13.44%

+26.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.24%

15.58%

+36.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.71%

17.63%

+25.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.47%

18.13%

+27.34%

Dividends

K.TO vs. XEF-U.TO - Dividend Comparison

K.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than XEF-U.TO's 2.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
K.TO
Kinross Gold Corporation
0.61%0.45%1.23%2.04%2.68%1.63%1.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XEF-U.TO
iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF
2.35%2.44%2.85%2.76%2.98%2.43%1.86%2.72%2.07%1.62%1.84%1.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


K.TO and XEF-U.TO have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for K.TO and XEF-U.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer