PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
K.TO vs. SII.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

K.TO vs. SII.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO) and Sprott Inc (SII.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, K.TO achieves a -7.26% return, which is significantly lower than SII.TO's 24.09% return. Over the past 10 years, K.TO has underperformed SII.TO with an annualized return of 19.71%, while SII.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 22.78% annualized return.


K.TO

1D
3.14%
1M
-8.25%
YTD
-7.26%
6M
-6.78%
1Y
67.56%
3Y*
79.11%
5Y*
32.58%
10Y*
19.71%

SII.TO

1D
2.64%
1M
-6.12%
YTD
24.09%
6M
29.21%
1Y
95.63%
3Y*
58.72%
5Y*
28.49%
10Y*
22.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

K.TO vs. SII.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
K.TO
Kinross Gold Corporation
-7.26%191.80%69.08%49.14%-22.75%-20.24%52.79%40.00%-18.82%29.36%
SII.TO
Sprott Inc
24.09%126.73%38.44%2.73%-18.97%57.52%25.86%16.40%5.75%-2.27%

Correlation

The correlation between K.TO and SII.TO is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2008

0.32

Over the past year, K.TO and SII.TO have become more correlated (0.57) than their long-term average of 0.32, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

K.TO:

CA$43.06B

SII.TO:

CA$4.28B

EPS

K.TO:

$2.36

SII.TO:

CA$4.14

PE Ratio

K.TO:

10.83

SII.TO:

40.09

PEG Ratio

K.TO:

0.14

SII.TO:

0.82

PS Ratio

K.TO:

3.90

SII.TO:

8.98

PB Ratio

K.TO:

3.39

SII.TO:

8.07

Total Revenue (TTM)

K.TO:

$7.97B

SII.TO:

CA$476.63M

Gross Profit (TTM)

K.TO:

$4.26B

SII.TO:

CA$369.54M

EBITDA (TTM)

K.TO:

$5.03B

SII.TO:

CA$151.96M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

K.TO vs. SII.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

K.TO
K.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
K.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
K.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
K.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
K.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
K.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

SII.TO
SII.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
SII.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SII.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
SII.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
SII.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
SII.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

K.TO vs. SII.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO) and Sprott Inc (SII.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


K.TOSII.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.35

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

3.19

-1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.71

8.77

-3.07

K.TO vs. SII.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current K.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the SII.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of K.TO and SII.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

K.TO vs. SII.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum K.TO drawdown since its inception was -92.37%, which is greater than SII.TO's maximum drawdown of -81.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for K.TO and SII.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


K.TOSII.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.37%

-81.85%

-10.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.29%

-30.05%

-6.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.29%

-30.05%

-6.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.71%

-43.38%

-10.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.36%

-48.06%

-20.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.94%

-26.34%

-4.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.98%

-50.79%

-5.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.29%

10.91%

+1.38%

Volatility

K.TO vs. SII.TO - Volatility Comparison

Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO) has a higher volatility of 18.19% compared to Sprott Inc (SII.TO) at 12.70%. This indicates that K.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SII.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


K.TOSII.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.19%

12.70%

+5.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.35%

38.96%

+0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.98%

45.64%

+5.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.47%

35.85%

+6.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.61%

37.11%

+8.50%

Dividends

K.TO vs. SII.TO - Dividend Comparison

K.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than SII.TO's 1.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
K.TO
Kinross Gold Corporation
0.56%0.45%1.23%2.04%2.68%1.63%0.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SII.TO
Sprott Inc
1.25%1.36%2.38%3.04%2.89%1.75%1.67%0.40%0.47%0.49%0.48%0.50%

Financials

K.TO vs. SII.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kinross Gold Corporation and Sprott Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
2.41B
199.39M
(K.TO) Total Revenue
(SII.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. K.TO values in USD, SII.TO values in CAD

K.TO vs. SII.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kinross Gold Corporation and Sprott Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
59.9%
91.6%
Portfolio components
K.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.44B and revenue of 2.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.9%.

SII.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sprott Inc reported a gross profit of 182.55M and revenue of 199.39M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 91.6%.

K.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 1.33B and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 55.1%.

SII.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sprott Inc reported an operating income of 57.39M and revenue of 199.39M, resulting in an operating margin of 28.8%.

K.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a net income of 843.00M and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in a net margin of 35.0%.

SII.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sprott Inc reported a net income of 40.08M and revenue of 199.39M, resulting in a net margin of 20.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


K.TO and SII.TO have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for K.TO and SII.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer