K.TO vs. IFC.TO
K.TO (Kinross Gold Corporation) and IFC.TO (Intact Financial Corporation) are both stocks. K.TO operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while IFC.TO operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, K.TO returned 19.43%/yr vs 15.01%/yr for IFC.TO. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
K.TO vs. IFC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, K.TO achieves a -7.85% return, which is significantly lower than IFC.TO's 0.86% return. Over the past 10 years, K.TO has outperformed IFC.TO with an annualized return of 19.43%, while IFC.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 15.01% annualized return.
K.TO
- 1D
- -4.64%
- 1M
- -9.04%
- YTD
- -7.85%
- 6M
- -11.74%
- 1Y
- 65.63%
- 3Y*
- 82.28%
- 5Y*
- 37.20%
- 10Y*
- 19.43%
IFC.TO
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- 4.62%
- YTD
- 0.86%
- 6M
- 0.93%
- 1Y
- -6.33%
- 3Y*
- 15.66%
- 5Y*
- 13.34%
- 10Y*
- 15.01%
K.TO vs. IFC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K.TO Kinross Gold Corporation | -7.85% | 191.80% | 69.08% | 49.14% | -22.75% | -20.24% | 52.79% | 40.00% | -18.82% | 29.36% |
IFC.TO Intact Financial Corporation | 0.86% | 11.22% | 31.00% | 6.96% | 21.06% | 11.37% | 10.01% | 45.11% | -2.83% | 12.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between K.TO and IFC.TO is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2006 | 0.08 |
The correlation between K.TO and IFC.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.14 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
K.TO:
CA$42.78B
IFC.TO:
CA$50.64B
K.TO:
$2.36
IFC.TO:
CA$19.31
K.TO:
10.62
IFC.TO:
14.76
K.TO:
0.14
IFC.TO:
0.68
K.TO:
3.83
IFC.TO:
1.88
K.TO:
3.32
IFC.TO:
2.63
K.TO:
$7.97B
IFC.TO:
CA$26.97B
K.TO:
$4.26B
IFC.TO:
CA$11.87B
K.TO:
$5.03B
IFC.TO:
CA$5.43B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
K.TO vs. IFC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
K.TO
IFC.TO
K.TO vs. IFC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO) and Intact Financial Corporation (IFC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| K.TO | IFC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 0.96 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | -0.29 | +2.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.02 | -0.45 | +5.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
K.TO vs. IFC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum K.TO drawdown since its inception was -92.37%, which is greater than IFC.TO's maximum drawdown of -52.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for K.TO and IFC.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| K.TO | IFC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.37% | -52.72% | -39.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.29% | -21.67% | -14.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.29% | -21.67% | -14.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.71% | -21.67% | -32.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.36% | -30.57% | -37.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.39% | -8.12% | -23.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.02% | -8.95% | -47.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.11% | 14.19% | -1.08% |
Volatility
K.TO vs. IFC.TO - Volatility Comparison
Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO) has a higher volatility of 17.29% compared to Intact Financial Corporation (IFC.TO) at 6.26%. This indicates that K.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| K.TO | IFC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.29% | 6.26% | +11.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.04% | 15.38% | +24.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.77% | 20.69% | +31.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.47% | 17.51% | +24.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.62% | 18.57% | +27.05% |
Dividends
K.TO vs. IFC.TO - Dividend Comparison
K.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than IFC.TO's 1.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFC.TO Intact Financial Corporation | 1.96% | 1.86% | 1.85% | 2.16% | 2.05% | 2.07% | 2.20% | 2.16% | 2.82% | 2.44% | 2.41% | 2.39% |
K.TO Kinross Gold Corporation | 0.56% | 0.45% | 1.23% | 2.04% | 2.68% | 1.63% | 0.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
K.TO vs. IFC.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kinross Gold Corporation and Intact Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
K.TO vs. IFC.TO - Profitability Comparison
K.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.44B and revenue of 2.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.9%.
IFC.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intact Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 7.30B and revenue of 7.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
K.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 1.33B and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 55.1%.
IFC.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intact Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 960.00M and revenue of 7.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.2%.
K.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a net income of 843.00M and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in a net margin of 35.0%.
IFC.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intact Financial Corporation reported a net income of 752.00M and revenue of 7.30B, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
K.TO and IFC.TO have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for K.TO and IFC.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer