PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
K.TO vs. IBKR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

K.TO vs. IBKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO) and Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

K.TO is traded in CAD, while IBKR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IBKR values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, K.TO achieves a -7.26% return, which is significantly lower than IBKR's 44.37% return. Over the past 10 years, K.TO has underperformed IBKR with an annualized return of 19.71%, while IBKR has yielded a comparatively higher 27.63% annualized return.


K.TO

1D
3.14%
1M
-8.25%
YTD
-7.26%
6M
-6.78%
1Y
67.56%
3Y*
79.11%
5Y*
32.58%
10Y*
19.71%

IBKR

1D
2.42%
1M
6.38%
YTD
44.37%
6M
43.88%
1Y
85.50%
3Y*
69.83%
5Y*
45.79%
10Y*
27.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

K.TO vs. IBKR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
K.TO
Kinross Gold Corporation
-7.26%191.80%69.08%49.14%-22.75%-20.24%52.79%40.00%-18.82%29.36%
IBKR
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
44.37%39.69%132.59%12.40%-2.55%31.05%28.59%-17.56%0.68%52.66%

Correlation

The correlation between K.TO and IBKR is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2007

0.03

Over the past year, K.TO and IBKR have become more correlated (0.26) than their long-term average of 0.03, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

K.TO:

CA$43.06B

IBKR:

$40.72B

EPS

K.TO:

$2.36

IBKR:

$3.76

PE Ratio

K.TO:

10.83

IBKR:

24.18

PEG Ratio

K.TO:

0.14

IBKR:

0.83

PS Ratio

K.TO:

3.90

IBKR:

4.66

PB Ratio

K.TO:

3.39

IBKR:

1.92

Total Revenue (TTM)

K.TO:

$7.97B

IBKR:

$8.69B

Gross Profit (TTM)

K.TO:

$4.26B

IBKR:

$7.75B

EBITDA (TTM)

K.TO:

$5.03B

IBKR:

$7.07B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

K.TO vs. IBKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

K.TO
K.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
K.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
K.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
K.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
K.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
K.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

IBKR
IBKR Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
IBKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBKR Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
IBKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBKR Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

K.TO vs. IBKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO) and Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


K.TOIBKRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.34

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

4.78

-2.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.71

11.14

-5.43

K.TO vs. IBKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current K.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the IBKR Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of K.TO and IBKR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

K.TO vs. IBKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum K.TO drawdown since its inception was -92.37%, which is greater than IBKR's maximum drawdown of -60.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for K.TO and IBKR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


K.TOIBKRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.37%

-60.80%

-31.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.29%

-17.26%

-19.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.29%

-38.74%

+2.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.71%

-38.74%

-14.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.36%

-49.54%

-18.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.94%

0.00%

-30.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.98%

-24.70%

-31.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.29%

7.39%

+4.90%

Volatility

K.TO vs. IBKR - Volatility Comparison

Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO) has a higher volatility of 18.19% compared to Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) at 11.24%. This indicates that K.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


K.TOIBKRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.19%

11.24%

+6.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.35%

27.89%

+11.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.98%

37.68%

+13.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.47%

35.00%

+7.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.61%

33.89%

+11.72%

Dividends

K.TO vs. IBKR - Dividend Comparison

K.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, more than IBKR's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBKR
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
0.36%0.47%0.48%0.48%0.55%0.50%0.66%0.86%0.73%0.68%1.10%0.92%
K.TO
Kinross Gold Corporation
0.56%0.45%1.23%2.04%2.68%1.63%0.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

K.TO vs. IBKR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kinross Gold Corporation and Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
2.41B
765.00M
(K.TO) Total Revenue
(IBKR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


K.TO and IBKR have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for K.TO and IBKR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer