K.TO vs. GDMN
K.TO (Kinross Gold Corporation) is a stock, while GDMN (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund) is Commodities fund actively managed by WisdomTree. Over the past 3 years, K.TO returned 84.07%/yr vs 60.36%/yr for GDMN. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure.
Performance
K.TO vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
K.TO is traded in CAD, while GDMN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GDMN values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, K.TO achieves a -4.17% return, which is significantly higher than GDMN's -8.69% return.
K.TO
- 1D
- -1.99%
- 1M
- -6.50%
- YTD
- -4.17%
- 6M
- -6.02%
- 1Y
- 74.93%
- 3Y*
- 84.07%
- 5Y*
- 38.18%
- 10Y*
- 20.94%
GDMN
- 1D
- -1.84%
- 1M
- -8.26%
- YTD
- -8.69%
- 6M
- -11.55%
- 1Y
- 70.50%
- 3Y*
- 60.36%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
K.TO vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K.TO Kinross Gold Corporation | -4.17% | 191.80% | 69.08% | 49.14% | -22.75% | 13.45% |
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund | -8.69% | 221.70% | 39.09% | 10.28% | -9.21% | 6.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between K.TO and GDMN is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2021 | 0.80 |
The correlation between K.TO and GDMN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
K.TO vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank
K.TO
GDMN
K.TO vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| K.TO | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.22 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 1.45 | +0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.01 | 3.76 | +2.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
K.TO vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum K.TO drawdown since its inception was -92.37%, which is greater than GDMN's maximum drawdown of -49.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for K.TO and GDMN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| K.TO | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.37% | -49.51% | -42.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.29% | -47.54% | +11.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.29% | -47.54% | +11.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.36% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.65% | -39.77% | +11.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.01% | -17.03% | -38.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.84% | 18.22% | -5.38% |
Volatility
K.TO vs. GDMN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO) is 17.53%, while WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) has a volatility of 22.04%. This indicates that K.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| K.TO | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.53% | 22.04% | -4.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.81% | 54.88% | -15.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.56% | 63.69% | -12.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.41% | 48.33% | -5.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.65% | 48.33% | -2.68% |
Dividends
K.TO vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison
K.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than GDMN's 3.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund | 3.05% | 2.70% | 9.44% | 7.69% | 1.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
K.TO Kinross Gold Corporation | 0.54% | 0.45% | 1.23% | 2.04% | 2.68% | 1.63% | 0.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
K.TO and GDMN have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for K.TO and GDMN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer