PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
K.TO vs. CBOE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

K.TO vs. CBOE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO) and Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

K.TO is traded in CAD, while CBOE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CBOE values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, K.TO achieves a -6.51% return, which is significantly lower than CBOE's 14.24% return. Over the past 10 years, K.TO has outperformed CBOE with an annualized return of 19.71%, while CBOE has yielded a comparatively lower 18.46% annualized return.


K.TO

1D
-1.23%
1M
-16.30%
YTD
-6.51%
6M
-1.43%
1Y
75.29%
3Y*
79.50%
5Y*
33.08%
10Y*
19.71%

CBOE

1D
-0.29%
1M
-17.74%
YTD
14.24%
6M
12.09%
1Y
29.83%
3Y*
29.83%
5Y*
24.77%
10Y*
18.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

K.TO vs. CBOE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
K.TO
Kinross Gold Corporation
-6.51%191.80%69.08%49.14%-22.75%-20.24%52.79%40.00%-18.82%29.36%
CBOE
Cboe Global Markets, Inc.
14.24%24.03%20.12%40.93%4.04%42.16%-23.04%19.04%-13.92%58.94%

Correlation

The correlation between K.TO and CBOE is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2010

0.04

Fundamentals

Market Cap

K.TO:

CA$43.41B

CBOE:

$29.43B

EPS

K.TO:

CA$2.36

CBOE:

$11.77

PE Ratio

K.TO:

15.26

CBOE:

23.83

PEG Ratio

K.TO:

0.20

CBOE:

0.44

PS Ratio

K.TO:

5.50

CBOE:

6.14

PB Ratio

K.TO:

4.77

CBOE:

5.48

Total Revenue (TTM)

K.TO:

CA$7.97B

CBOE:

$4.79B

Gross Profit (TTM)

K.TO:

CA$4.26B

CBOE:

$2.50B

EBITDA (TTM)

K.TO:

CA$5.03B

CBOE:

$1.87B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

K.TO vs. CBOE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

K.TO
K.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
K.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
K.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
K.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
K.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
K.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

CBOE
CBOE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
CBOE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBOE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBOE Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
CBOE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBOE Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

K.TO vs. CBOE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO) and Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


K.TOCBOEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.21

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

1.24

+1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.53

6.07

+0.46

K.TO vs. CBOE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current K.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is higher than the CBOE Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of K.TO and CBOE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


K.TOCBOEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

1.09

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

1.03

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.71

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.71

-0.59

Drawdowns

K.TO vs. CBOE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum K.TO drawdown since its inception was -92.37%, which is greater than CBOE's maximum drawdown of -39.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for K.TO and CBOE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


K.TOCBOEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.37%

-39.92%

-52.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.38%

-24.18%

-6.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.38%

-24.18%

-6.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.67%

-24.18%

-33.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.36%

-38.41%

-29.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.38%

-22.29%

-8.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.97%

-10.89%

-45.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.56%

4.93%

+6.63%

Volatility

K.TO vs. CBOE - Volatility Comparison

Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO) and Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE) have volatilities of 16.35% and 15.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


K.TOCBOEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.35%

15.66%

+0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.46%

24.05%

+14.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.39%

27.61%

+22.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.32%

24.20%

+18.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.55%

26.13%

+19.42%

Dividends

K.TO vs. CBOE - Dividend Comparison

K.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than CBOE's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBOE
Cboe Global Markets, Inc.
1.03%1.08%1.21%1.18%1.56%1.38%1.68%1.12%1.19%0.83%1.30%1.36%
K.TO
Kinross Gold Corporation
0.56%0.45%1.23%2.04%2.68%1.63%0.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

K.TO vs. CBOE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kinross Gold Corporation and Cboe Global Markets, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
2.41B
1.27B
(K.TO) Total Revenue
(CBOE) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. K.TO values in CAD, CBOE values in USD

K.TO vs. CBOE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kinross Gold Corporation and Cboe Global Markets, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
59.9%
52.6%
Portfolio components
K.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.44B and revenue of 2.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.9%.

CBOE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cboe Global Markets, Inc. reported a gross profit of 669.90M and revenue of 1.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.6%.

K.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 1.33B and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 55.1%.

CBOE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cboe Global Markets, Inc. reported an operating income of 505.60M and revenue of 1.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 39.7%.

K.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a net income of 843.00M and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in a net margin of 35.0%.

CBOE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cboe Global Markets, Inc. reported a net income of 385.70M and revenue of 1.27B, resulting in a net margin of 30.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


K.TO and CBOE have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for K.TO and CBOE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer