JVMRX vs. PDT

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

JVMRX (John Hancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class R6) and PDT (John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund) are both mutual funds - JVMRX is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell Mid Cap Value Index, while PDT is a Dividend fund managed by John Hancock. Over the past 10 years, JVMRX returned 10.34%/yr vs 6.16%/yr for PDT. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JVMRX charges 0.74%/yr vs 5.06%/yr for PDT.

Performance

JVMRX vs. PDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class R6 (JVMRX) and John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JVMRX achieves a 6.23% return, which is significantly higher than PDT's 4.25% return. Over the past 10 years, JVMRX has outperformed PDT with an annualized return of 10.34%, while PDT has yielded a comparatively lower 6.16% annualized return.

JVMRX

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: -0.51%
• YTD: 6.23%
• 6M: 5.99%
• 1Y: 16.14%
• 3Y*: 14.44%
• 5Y*: 7.92%
• 10Y*: 10.34%

PDT

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: -2.26%
• YTD: 4.25%
• 6M: 3.14%
• 1Y: 5.27%
• 3Y*: 12.89%
• 5Y*: 2.70%
• 10Y*: 6.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JVMRX vs. PDT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JVMRX John Hancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class R6	6.23%	11.40%	10.59%	16.81%	-7.00%	26.95%	6.00%	30.26%	-14.75%	15.06%
PDT John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund	4.25%	7.64%	29.92%	-9.55%	-16.30%	25.98%	-14.20%	39.29%	-12.49%	21.22%

Correlation

The correlation between JVMRX and PDT is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2011	0.42

The correlation between JVMRX and PDT shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (all time) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

JVMRX vs. PDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JVMRX

JVMRX Risk / Return Rank: 21
JVMRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
JVMRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
JVMRX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
JVMRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
JVMRX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

PDT

PDT Risk / Return Rank: 7
PDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
PDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
PDT Omega Ratio Rank: 6
PDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
PDT Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JVMRX vs. PDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class R6 (JVMRX) and John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JVMRX	PDT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.26	0.59	+0.67
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.92	0.88	+1.04
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.11	+0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.85	0.95	+0.90
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.98	2.20	+3.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JVMRX vs. PDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JVMRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is higher than the PDT Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JVMRX and PDT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JVMRX	PDT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.26	0.59	+0.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	0.16	+0.27
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.51	0.25	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.31	+0.33

Drawdowns

JVMRX vs. PDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JVMRX drawdown since its inception was -42.63%, smaller than the maximum PDT drawdown of -62.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JVMRX and PDT.

Drawdown Indicators

	JVMRX	PDT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.63%	-62.39%	+19.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.61%	-5.38%	-3.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.18%	-22.06%	+0.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.18%	-40.44%	+19.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.63%	-62.39%	+19.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.31%	-3.73%	+1.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.37%	-10.02%	+5.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.66%	2.32%	+0.34%

Volatility

JVMRX vs. PDT - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class R6 (JVMRX) and John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT) have volatilities of 3.21% and 3.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JVMRX	PDT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.21%	3.08%	+0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.18%	7.03%	+2.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.80%	8.92%	+3.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.41%	17.03%	+1.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.33%	25.17%	-4.84%

JVMRX vs. PDT - Expense Ratio Comparison

JVMRX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than PDT's 5.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

JVMRX vs. PDT - Dividend Comparison

JVMRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.81%, more than PDT's 7.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JVMRX John Hancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class R6	8.81%	9.36%	12.17%	4.12%	5.38%	6.78%	1.22%	2.49%	14.01%	5.94%	1.91%	5.88%
PDT John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund	7.72%	7.80%	7.77%	10.14%	9.04%	6.42%	8.43%	6.70%	8.69%	9.94%	9.15%	7.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JVMRX and PDT in my portfolio?

JVMRX and PDT have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JVMRX or PDT?

JVMRX has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to PDT (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JVMRX dropped -42.63% vs PDT's -62.39%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JVMRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.