PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JVMRX vs. CIMDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JVMRX vs. CIMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class R6 (JVMRX) and Clarkston Founders Fund (CIMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JVMRX achieves a 6.23% return, which is significantly higher than CIMDX's -2.83% return.


JVMRX

1D
-0.03%
1M
-0.51%
YTD
6.23%
6M
5.99%
1Y
16.14%
3Y*
14.44%
5Y*
7.92%
10Y*
10.34%

CIMDX

1D
2.09%
1M
0.69%
YTD
-2.83%
6M
-1.26%
1Y
4.57%
3Y*
6.25%
5Y*
0.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JVMRX vs. CIMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JVMRX
John Hancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class R6
6.23%11.40%10.59%16.81%-7.00%26.95%6.00%30.26%-14.75%12.59%
CIMDX
Clarkston Founders Fund
-2.83%7.35%5.67%10.38%-3.67%6.23%23.21%23.74%-7.85%11.25%

Correlation

The correlation between JVMRX and CIMDX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

0.85

The correlation between JVMRX and CIMDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JVMRX vs. CIMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JVMRX
JVMRX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
JVMRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JVMRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
JVMRX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
JVMRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
JVMRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

CIMDX
CIMDX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
CIMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
CIMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JVMRX vs. CIMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class R6 (JVMRX) and Clarkston Founders Fund (CIMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JVMRXCIMDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.26

0.27

+0.99

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.92

0.51

+1.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.06

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

0.38

+1.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.98

0.95

+5.04

JVMRX vs. CIMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JVMRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is higher than the CIMDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JVMRX and CIMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JVMRXCIMDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

0.27

+0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.06

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.42

+0.22

Drawdowns

JVMRX vs. CIMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JVMRX drawdown since its inception was -42.63%, which is greater than CIMDX's maximum drawdown of -31.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JVMRX and CIMDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JVMRXCIMDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.63%

-31.86%

-10.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.61%

-11.30%

+2.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.18%

-14.82%

-6.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.18%

-20.40%

-0.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.31%

-6.49%

+4.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.37%

-5.91%

+1.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

4.48%

-1.82%

Volatility

JVMRX vs. CIMDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class R6 (JVMRX) is 3.21%, while Clarkston Founders Fund (CIMDX) has a volatility of 4.83%. This indicates that JVMRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JVMRXCIMDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.21%

4.83%

-1.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.18%

12.02%

-2.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.80%

15.95%

-3.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.41%

15.98%

+2.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.33%

17.51%

+2.82%

JVMRX vs. CIMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JVMRX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than CIMDX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

JVMRX vs. CIMDX - Dividend Comparison

JVMRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.81%, more than CIMDX's 3.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIMDX
Clarkston Founders Fund
3.34%3.24%0.45%1.62%6.38%0.44%0.91%3.32%2.27%0.41%0.00%0.00%
JVMRX
John Hancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class R6
8.81%9.36%12.17%4.12%5.38%6.78%1.22%2.49%14.01%5.94%1.91%5.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


JVMRX and CIMDX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIMDX has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to JVMRX (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JVMRX dropped -42.63% vs CIMDX's -31.86%.

JVMRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JVMRX and CIMDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer