JVMRX vs. NMAVX
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class R6 (JVMRX) and Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund (NMAVX).
JVMRX is a passively managed fund by John Hancock that tracks the performance of the Russell Mid Cap Value Index. It was launched on Sep 1, 2011. NMAVX is managed by Nuance Investments. It was launched on Dec 31, 2013.
Performance
JVMRX vs. NMAVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JVMRX vs. NMAVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JVMRX John Hancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class R6 | 1.20% | 11.40% | 10.59% | 16.81% | -7.00% | 26.95% | 6.00% | 30.26% | -14.75% | 15.06% |
NMAVX Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund | 2.01% | 1.91% | 5.20% | 6.44% | -5.26% | 11.10% | 4.41% | 30.71% | -5.44% | 14.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JVMRX achieves a 1.20% return, which is significantly lower than NMAVX's 2.01% return. Over the past 10 years, JVMRX has outperformed NMAVX with an annualized return of 10.22%, while NMAVX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.67% annualized return.
JVMRX
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- -6.68%
- YTD
- 1.20%
- 6M
- 0.70%
- 1Y
- 14.10%
- 3Y*
- 12.81%
- 5Y*
- 8.35%
- 10Y*
- 10.22%
NMAVX
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- -7.03%
- YTD
- 2.01%
- 6M
- 4.85%
- 1Y
- 10.22%
- 3Y*
- 4.10%
- 5Y*
- 3.00%
- 10Y*
- 7.67%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JVMRX vs. NMAVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JVMRX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than NMAVX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JVMRX vs. NMAVX — Risk / Return Rank
JVMRX
NMAVX
JVMRX vs. NMAVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class R6 (JVMRX) and Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund (NMAVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JVMRX | NMAVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.81 | 0.73 | +0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.26 | 1.17 | +0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.14 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.16 | 1.09 | +0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.77 | 3.40 | +1.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JVMRX | NMAVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 | 0.73 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.23 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.51 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.50 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between JVMRX and NMAVX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JVMRX vs. NMAVX - Dividend Comparison
JVMRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.25%, more than NMAVX's 0.98% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JVMRX John Hancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class R6 | 9.25% | 9.36% | 12.17% | 4.12% | 5.38% | 6.78% | 1.22% | 2.49% | 14.01% | 5.94% | 1.91% | 5.88% |
NMAVX Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund | 0.98% | 1.00% | 7.55% | 1.78% | 9.05% | 11.98% | 0.61% | 5.91% | 7.16% | 7.05% | 1.83% | 4.24% |
Drawdowns
JVMRX vs. NMAVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JVMRX drawdown since its inception was -42.63%, which is greater than NMAVX's maximum drawdown of -30.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JVMRX and NMAVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JVMRX | NMAVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.63% | -30.93% | -11.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.22% | -9.80% | -3.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.18% | -18.40% | -2.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.63% | -30.93% | -11.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.93% | -7.84% | +0.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.39% | -3.77% | -0.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.23% | 3.15% | +0.08% |
Volatility
JVMRX vs. NMAVX - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class R6 (JVMRX) has a higher volatility of 4.42% compared to Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund (NMAVX) at 3.80%. This indicates that JVMRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NMAVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JVMRX | NMAVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.42% | 3.80% | +0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.80% | 7.63% | +2.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.11% | 14.28% | +3.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.46% | 13.21% | +5.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.33% | 15.05% | +5.28% |