PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JVMRX vs. FASPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JVMRX vs. FASPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class R6 (JVMRX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JVMRX achieves a 14.35% return, which is significantly lower than FASPX's 28.35% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JVMRX having a 10.96% annualized return and FASPX not far ahead at 11.39%.


JVMRX

1D
0.06%
1M
2.11%
6M
9.03%
YTD
14.35%
1Y
19.20%
3Y*
14.04%
5Y*
10.15%
10Y*
10.96%
ALL TIME*
12.65%

FASPX

1D
-0.22%
1M
1.80%
6M
16.94%
YTD
28.35%
1Y
42.96%
3Y*
12.20%
5Y*
9.96%
10Y*
11.39%
ALL TIME*
8.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

JVMRX vs. FASPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JVMRX
John Hancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class R6
14.35%11.40%10.59%16.81%-7.00%26.95%6.00%30.26%-14.75%15.06%
FASPX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M
28.35%7.76%-2.60%19.93%-7.82%32.65%7.70%33.85%-17.27%17.34%

Correlation

The correlation between JVMRX and FASPX is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2011

0.95

The correlation between JVMRX and FASPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JVMRX vs. FASPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JVMRX
JVMRX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
JVMRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JVMRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
JVMRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
JVMRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
JVMRX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

FASPX
FASPX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FASPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FASPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FASPX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FASPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FASPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JVMRX vs. FASPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class R6 (JVMRX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JVMRXFASPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.41

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

4.14

-2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.79

15.98

-9.19

JVMRX vs. FASPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JVMRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the FASPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JVMRX and FASPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JVMRX vs. FASPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JVMRX drawdown since its inception was -42.63%, smaller than the maximum FASPX drawdown of -70.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JVMRX and FASPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JVMRXFASPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.63%

-70.11%

+27.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.61%

-9.84%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.18%

-34.53%

+13.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.18%

-34.53%

+13.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.63%

-48.02%

+5.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.54%

-1.13%

-0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.33%

-9.80%

+5.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

2.55%

+0.10%

Volatility

JVMRX vs. FASPX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class R6 (JVMRX) has a higher volatility of 3.46% compared to Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX) at 3.26%. This indicates that JVMRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FASPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JVMRXFASPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

3.26%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.11%

11.72%

-2.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.98%

16.94%

-3.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.24%

20.59%

-2.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.24%

21.95%

-1.71%

JVMRX vs. FASPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JVMRX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than FASPX's 1.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

JVMRX vs. FASPX - Dividend Comparison

JVMRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.18%, more than FASPX's 7.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FASPX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M
7.26%9.32%0.00%2.40%1.93%7.80%0.55%4.98%15.67%7.26%21.61%0.80%
JVMRX
John Hancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class R6
8.18%9.36%12.17%4.12%5.38%6.78%1.22%2.49%14.01%5.94%1.91%5.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, JVMRX and FASPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JVMRX has higher volatility (3.46%) compared to FASPX (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JVMRX dropped -42.63% vs FASPX's -70.11%.

FASPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JVMRX and FASPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer