PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JUST vs. QUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JUST vs. QUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (JUST) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JUST achieves a 8.81% return, which is significantly higher than QUS's 5.85% return.


JUST

1D
-0.50%
1M
-1.46%
YTD
8.81%
6M
7.80%
1Y
23.04%
3Y*
20.62%
5Y*
12.37%
10Y*

QUS

1D
0.04%
1M
-1.09%
YTD
5.85%
6M
4.77%
1Y
15.61%
3Y*
16.80%
5Y*
10.66%
10Y*
13.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JUST vs. QUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
JUST
Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
8.81%17.60%23.73%24.86%-17.88%26.89%19.59%31.54%-9.96%
QUS
SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
5.85%14.13%18.99%21.78%-14.15%26.72%12.40%32.45%-6.83%

Correlation

The correlation between JUST and QUS is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2018

0.95

The correlation between JUST and QUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

JUST vs. QUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JUST
QUS

Technology

37.9%
29.2%

Financial Services

12.6%
14.0%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
5.5%

Healthcare

8.6%
13.4%

Communication Services

8.4%
9.9%

Industrials

8.3%
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
8.7%

Energy

3.3%
4.2%

Utilities

2.6%
3.4%

Basic Materials

2.1%
2.2%

Real Estate

2.0%
1.3%

Technology

JUST
37.9%
QUS
29.2%

Financial Services

JUST
12.6%
QUS
14.0%

Consumer Cyclical

JUST
8.9%
QUS
5.5%

Healthcare

JUST
8.6%
QUS
13.4%

Communication Services

JUST
8.4%
QUS
9.9%

Industrials

JUST
8.3%
QUS
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

JUST
5.1%
QUS
8.7%

Energy

JUST
3.3%
QUS
4.2%

Utilities

JUST
2.6%
QUS
3.4%

Basic Materials

JUST
2.1%
QUS
2.2%

Real Estate

JUST
2.0%
QUS
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JUST vs. QUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JUST
JUST Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
JUST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JUST Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
JUST Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
JUST Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
JUST Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

QUS
QUS Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
QUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUS Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
QUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JUST vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (JUST) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JUSTQUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.31

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

2.29

+0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.78

10.09

+1.68

JUST vs. QUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JUST Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the QUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JUST and QUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JUST vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JUST drawdown since its inception was -33.83%, roughly equal to the maximum QUS drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JUST and QUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JUSTQUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.83%

-33.78%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.76%

-6.85%

-1.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.34%

-13.94%

-5.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.72%

-22.30%

-2.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.26%

-1.80%

-1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.08%

-3.69%

-1.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

1.55%

+0.41%

Volatility

JUST vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (JUST) has a higher volatility of 4.61% compared to SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) at 2.71%. This indicates that JUST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JUSTQUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.61%

2.71%

+1.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.85%

6.96%

+2.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.48%

9.20%

+3.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.87%

14.34%

+2.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.11%

16.43%

+2.68%

JUST vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

JUST has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than QUS's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JUST vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison

JUST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than QUS's 1.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JUST
Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
0.72%1.02%1.11%1.37%1.51%1.07%1.36%1.86%1.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QUS
SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
1.32%1.38%1.49%1.57%1.68%1.27%1.73%1.81%2.12%1.86%2.07%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


JUST and QUS have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JUST has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to QUS (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JUST dropped -33.83% vs QUS's -33.78%.

On 5-year performance, JUST leads with 12.37% vs 10.66% for QUS. On fees, QUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JUST has performed better with a 12.37% return vs 10.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for JUST.

QUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.72% for JUST.

JUST tracks JUST US Large Cap Diversified Index, while QUS tracks MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped (USD). They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for JUST and 0.15% for QUS.

JUST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JUST and QUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer