PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JUST vs. MFUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JUST vs. MFUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (JUST) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JUST achieves a 11.64% return, which is significantly lower than MFUS's 16.37% return.


JUST

1D
-0.74%
1M
4.90%
YTD
11.64%
6M
11.94%
1Y
29.04%
3Y*
22.10%
5Y*
13.24%
10Y*

MFUS

1D
0.03%
1M
5.72%
YTD
16.37%
6M
16.58%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.25%
5Y*
12.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JUST vs. MFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
JUST
Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
11.64%17.60%23.73%24.86%-17.88%26.89%19.59%31.54%-9.62%
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF
16.37%16.02%20.17%12.19%-5.82%24.10%10.64%26.17%-12.37%

Correlation

The correlation between JUST and MFUS is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2018

0.89

The correlation between JUST and MFUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

JUST vs. MFUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JUST
MFUS

Technology

35.8%
21.8%

Financial Services

12.5%
12.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
10.6%

Communication Services

9.3%
5.3%

Healthcare

8.6%
13.5%

Industrials

8.6%
12.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
10.3%

Energy

3.6%
7.0%

Utilities

2.2%
1.7%

Real Estate

2.2%
1.8%

Basic Materials

2.2%
2.8%

Technology

JUST
35.8%
MFUS
21.8%

Financial Services

JUST
12.5%
MFUS
12.6%

Consumer Cyclical

JUST
9.8%
MFUS
10.6%

Communication Services

JUST
9.3%
MFUS
5.3%

Healthcare

JUST
8.6%
MFUS
13.5%

Industrials

JUST
8.6%
MFUS
12.6%

Consumer Defensive

JUST
5.5%
MFUS
10.3%

Energy

JUST
3.6%
MFUS
7.0%

Utilities

JUST
2.2%
MFUS
1.7%

Real Estate

JUST
2.2%
MFUS
1.8%

Basic Materials

JUST
2.2%
MFUS
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JUST vs. MFUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JUST
JUST Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
JUST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JUST Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
JUST Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
JUST Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
JUST Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

MFUS
MFUS Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
MFUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
MFUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JUST vs. MFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (JUST) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JUSTMFUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.47

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

4.41

-1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.48

18.13

-2.64

JUST vs. MFUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JUST Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the MFUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JUST and MFUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JUSTMFUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

2.63

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.86

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.79

-0.01

Drawdowns

JUST vs. MFUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JUST drawdown since its inception was -33.83%, roughly equal to the maximum MFUS drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JUST and MFUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JUSTMFUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.83%

-35.21%

+1.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.76%

-6.39%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.34%

-15.39%

-3.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.72%

-18.22%

-6.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

0.00%

-0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.10%

-4.00%

-1.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

1.55%

+0.33%

Volatility

JUST vs. MFUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (JUST) is 2.94%, while PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) has a volatility of 3.19%. This indicates that JUST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JUSTMFUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

3.19%

-0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.09%

8.22%

+0.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.88%

10.72%

+1.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.78%

15.03%

+1.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.12%

17.35%

+1.77%

JUST vs. MFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

JUST has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than MFUS's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

JUST vs. MFUS - Dividend Comparison

JUST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than MFUS's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
JUST
Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
0.93%1.02%1.11%1.37%1.51%1.07%1.36%1.86%1.11%0.00%
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF
1.36%1.54%1.45%1.96%2.07%1.35%1.72%1.89%1.69%1.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


JUST and MFUS have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFUS has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to JUST (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JUST dropped -33.83% vs MFUS's -35.21%.

On 5-year performance, JUST leads with 13.24% vs 12.82% for MFUS. On fees, JUST is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, JUST has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JUST has performed better with a 13.24% return vs 12.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JUST is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for MFUS.

MFUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.93% for JUST.

JUST tracks JUST US Large Cap Diversified Index, while MFUS tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index​. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for JUST and 0.30% for MFUS.

MFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JUST and MFUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer